Jennifer Wada at 03:59, 12 April 2006

2006-04-12T03:59:10Z

Jennifer Wada at 10:52, 8 March 2006

2006-03-08T10:52:35Z

New page

the property is located are notified
and given 45 days in which to
comment.
After receiving the comments of the
State Historic Preservation Officer
and chief elected official, or if
there has been no response within 45
days, the Federal Preservation Officer
may approve the nomination and forward
it to the Keeper of the National
Register.
Determination of Eligibility: Many
Federal agencies have not completed
the inventory of all properties under
their ownership that appear to qualify
for inclusion on the National
Register. In the absence of such
inventories, and before any
projects are undertaken that may harm
possible historical sites, Federal
agencies are required to request the
opinion of the Secretary of the
Interior regarding properties that may
be eligible for inclusion on the
Register. Thus, the Keeper of the
National Register will make a "determination
of eligibility" regarding
such properties.
An important role in this process
is played by the Advisory Council on
Historic Preservation. The Council
has regulations whose purpose is to
protect properties included in, or
eligible for inclusion in, the
National Register. This protection is
afforded through review and comment by
the Council on Federal undertakings
that affect such properties. The
process of consultation is designed to
ensure that alternatives to avoid or
mitigate an adverse effect on a
National Register or eligible property
are adequately considered in the
Federal agency's planning process. It
should be noted, however, that
ultimately the decision lies with the
Federal agency on whether or not to
change its plans.
Determination of eligibility does
not constitute listing in the National
Register. However, properties
determined eligible receive the same
governmental protection from harm and
destruction as those on the Register.
Private owners of property on the
eligible list are not eligible for
benefits such as grants, loans, or tax
incentives that have listing on the
National Register as a prerequisite.
Determination of eligibility may be
made with or without the request of
the Federal agency involved.
After the determination, written
notice is given to the Federal agency
and the State Historic Preservation
Officer. In addition, public notice
of properties determined eligible is
published in the Federal Register.
Differences in Review Processes:
There are several differences between
the review procedures for Federal and
State/County projects. The Hawaii
State Historic Preservation Plan
summarizes them as follows:
• Differences in legal
authority: Legal authority
mandating review of federal
projects stems primarily from
Sec. 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act of
1966, Executive Order 11593,
the National Environmental
Policy Act, and Sec. 4F of
the Department of Transportation
Act of 1966. Legal
authority mandating review of
the State/County projects
stems from Sec. 6E-8, [Hawaii
Revised Statutes].
• Differences in reviewing
agencies: The primary
reviewing agencies for
federal projects are the
State Historic Preservation.
210

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 and given 45 days in which to
 comment.
 After receiving the comments of the
 State Historic Preservation Officer
@@ Line 10: / Line 11: @@
 it to the Keeper of the National
 Register.
 Determination of Eligibility: Many
 Federal agencies have not completed
 the inventory of all properties under
@@ Line 27: / Line 29: @@
 of eligibility" regarding
 such properties.
 An important role in this process
 is played by the Advisory Council on
@@ Line 47: / Line 50: @@
 Federal agency on whether or not to
 change its plans.
 Determination of eligibility does
 not constitute listing in the National
@@ Line 66: / Line 70: @@
 Officer. In addition, public notice
 of properties determined eligible is
-published in the Federal Register.
+published in the <u>Federal Register</u>.
 Differences in Review Processes:
 There are several differences between
 the review procedures for Federal and
@@ Line 73: / Line 78: @@
 State Historic Preservation Plan
 summarizes them as follows:
-• Differences in legal
+:*Differences in legal authority: Legal authority mandating review of federal projects stems primarily from Sec. 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, Executive Order 11593, the National Environmental Policy Act, and Sec. 4F of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966. Legal authority mandating review of the State/County projects stems from Sec. 6E-8, [Hawaii Revised Statutes].
-authority: Legal authority
+:*Differences in reviewing agencies: The primary reviewing agencies for federal projects are the State Historic Preservation.
-mandating review of federal
+{{p|210}}

Template:Nhsc-v1-210 - Revision history

Jennifer Wada at 03:59, 12 April 2006

Jennifer Wada at 10:52, 8 March 2006