Jennifer Wada at 07:21, 12 April 2006

2006-04-12T07:21:09Z

Jennifer Wada at 10:52, 8 March 2006

2006-03-08T10:52:58Z

New page

Officer and the Advisory
Council on Historic
Preservation. For State/County
projects the reviewing agency
is the Department of Land and
Natural Resources.
• Differences in review
procedures: There are two
major differences. One
difference between Federal
and State/County review
procedures is that Federal
projects must consider
effects to properties
eligible for the National
Register, as well as those
already listed on the
Register. The provision to
consider eligibility is very
important in that it requires
, an identification and
evaluation of historic
resources in unsurveyed
areas. State/County projects
must also consider
unregistered properties;
however, the determination of
eligibility procedures are
not formulated...The second
major difference is the
availability at the Federal
level of a conflict
resolution mechanism if there
is disagreement over
appropriate mitigative
measures. The mechanism is
the Advisory Council on
Historic Preservation. There
is authority already
established at the State
level to implement a similar
advisory council to advise
the governor when conflicts
arise between State agencies
(Sec. 6E-8); however, the
provision has not been
implemented. 39/
Acceptance on the National
Register
Generally, the National Park
Service relies on States and Federal
agencies to identify historic
properties for National Register
listing. Because of the experience
and ability of the States and Federal
agencies in identifying and evaluating
historic and cultural properties, the
National Park Service will, in most
instances, list nominations by States
with approved State programs and by
Federal agencies without substantive
review. This acceptance requires that
the Federal agency or State certify
that the procedures for making
nominations have been iroperly
followed, the documentation is
sufficient, and the nomination meets
the National Register criteria for
evaluation.
Appeals for Nomination
The Department of the Interior is
in the process of establishing
procedures for appealing nominations.
Under these procedures, any person
or local government may appeal to the
Keeper of the National Register the
failure or refusal of a nominating
authority to nominate a property that
they consider to meet the National
Register criteria for evaluation.
An applicant seeking to have
property nominated to the National
Register may appeal directly to the
Keeper under the following
circumstances:
Where the applicant—
1) Disagrees with the
decision of the State
Historic Preservation
211

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-Officer and the Advisory
+::Officer and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation. For State/County projects the reviewing agency is the Department of Land and Natural Resources.
 Council on Historic
-Preservation. For State/County
+:*Differences in review procedures: There are two major differences. One difference between Federal and State/County review procedures is that Federal projects must consider effects to properties <u>eligible</u> for the National Register, as well as those already listed on the Register. The provision to consider eligibility is very important in that it requires, an identification and evaluation of historic resources in unsurveyed areas. State/County projects must also consider unregistered properties; however, the determination of eligibility procedures are not formulated...The second major difference is the availability at the Federal level of a conflict resolution mechanism if there is disagreement over appropriate mitigative measures. The mechanism is the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation. There is authority already established at the State level to implement a similar advisory council to advise the governor when conflicts arise between State agencies (Sec. 6E-8); however, the provision has not been implemented. <u>39</u>/
 projects the reviewing agency
-is the Department of Land and
+====<u>Acceptance on the National Register</u>====
 Natural Resources.
-• Differences in review
+Generally, the National Park Service relies on States and Federal agencies to identify historic properties for National Register listing. Because of the experience and ability of the States and Federal agencies in identifying and evaluating historic and cultural properties, the National Park Service will, in most instances, list nominations by States with approved State programs and by Federal agencies without substantive review. This acceptance requires that the Federal agency or State certify that the procedures for making nominations have been properly followed, the documentation is sufficient, and the nomination meets the National Register criteria for evaluation.
 procedures: There are two
-major differences. One
+====<u>Appeals for Nomination</u>=====
 difference between Federal
-and State/County review
+The Department of the Interior is in the process of establishing procedures for appealing nominations. Under these procedures, any person or local government may appeal to the Keeper of the National Register the failure or refusal of a nominating authority to nominate a property that they consider to meet the National Register criteria for evaluation.
 procedures is that Federal
-projects must consider
+An applicant seeking to have property nominated to the National Register may appeal directly to the Keeper under the following circumstances:
 effects to properties
-eligible for the National
+:Where the applicant—
-Register, as well as those
+::1) Disagrees with the decision of the State Historic Preservation
-already listed on the
+{{p|211}}

Template:Nhsc-v1-211 - Revision history

Jennifer Wada at 07:21, 12 April 2006

Jennifer Wada at 10:52, 8 March 2006