Reid Ginoza at 02:30, 14 April 2006

2006-04-14T02:30:49Z

Jennifer Wada at 10:53, 8 March 2006

2006-03-08T10:53:13Z

New page

Officer or the Federal
Preservation Officer not to
submit an adequatelydocumented
nomination form to
the National Park Service
after it has been processed by
the State or Federal agency;
2) Disagrees with a decision of
the State Historic
Preservation Officer not to
submit an adequatelydocumented
nomination form
to the State Review Board;
3) Believes that the State
Historic Preservation
Officer has not scheduled an
adequately-documented
nomination form for State
Review Board consideration
within a reasonable period
of time consistent with the
State'8 priorities for
nominations.
The Keeper will respond in writing
to the request within 30 days. The
decision may:
• Deny the appeal;
• Recommend that the State
Historic Preservation Office
submit the nomination form to
the State Review Board;
• Recommend that the State
Historic Preservation Officer
submit the nomination form to
the State Review Board for
consideration at an earlier
date than scheduled;
• Provide notice that the
Keeper will consider for
listing a nomination form
previously approved or
disapproved by the State
Review Board or a Federal
agency nomination form.
Current Historic Preservation Issues
The preceding sections have
concentrated on existing State and
Federal laws on historic preserva*.or
However, as pointed out in comments
received by the Commission, 40/ there
are numerous practical problems in t±
implementation and enforcement of
these regulations.
Native Hawaiians are concerned
about protection of ancient religious
sites—a concern that was voiced to
the Commission not only in the writter
comments cited above, but in public
testimony before the Commission in
January 1982. 41/ At the State level,
a comment from Kenneth Chan notes that
"the State Historic Preservation Plan
has not even been adopted into law,
and has in fact been shelved for the
past three years. There is no_ comprehensive
plan adopted and utilized by
the State at this time." 42/
Another problem already mentioned
above is the removal of 579 sites from
the State Register because they were
not properly registered. In addition,
staffing and funding difficulties also
plague the State's historic
preservation program.
The problems of protecting historic
sites of importance to native
Hawaiians are not totally administrative,
however. An even greater
difficulty may be that criteria for
eligibility as they now exist do not
always address the religious and
cultural significance of land regarded
as sacred by native Hawaiians.
According to one native Hawaiian:
The concerns of Hawaiians...are
different from the concerns of
archaeologists. We are trained
in the Western scientific
tradition. We see archaeologic
sites primarily as repositories
of information. This is in
212

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-Officer or the Federal
+:: Officer or the Federal Preservation Officer not to submit an adequately-documented nomination form to the National Park Service after it has been processed by the State or Federal agency;
 Preservation Officer not to
-submit an adequatelydocumented
+:: 2) Disagrees with a decision of the State Historic Preservation Officer not to submit an adequately-documented nomination form to the State Review Board;
 nomination form to
-the National Park Service
+::3) Believes that the State Historic Preservation Officer has not scheduled an adequately-documented nomination form for State Review Board consideration within a reasonable period of time consistent with the State's priorities for nominations.
 after it has been processed by
 The Keeper will respond in writing
 to the request within 30 days. The
 decision may:
-• Deny the appeal;
-• Recommend that the State
+* Deny the appeal;
-Historic Preservation Office
+* Recommend that the State Historic Preservation Office submit the nomination form to the State Review Board;
-submit the nomination form to
+* Recommend that the State Historic Preservation Officer submit the nomination form to the State Review Board for consideration at an earlier date than scheduled;
-the State Review Board;
+* Provide notice that the Keeper will consider for listing a nomination form previously approved or disapproved by the State Review Board or a Federal agency nomination form.
-• Recommend that the State
-Historic Preservation Officer
+====Current Historic Preservation Issues====
 The preceding sections have
 concentrated on existing State and
-Federal laws on historic preserva*.or
+Federal laws on historic preservation.
 However, as pointed out in comments
-received by the Commission, 40/ there
+received by the Commission, <u>40</u>/ there
-are numerous practical problems in t±
+are numerous practical problems in the
 implementation and enforcement of
 these regulations.
 Native Hawaiians are concerned
 about protection of ancient religious
 sites—a concern that was voiced to
-the Commission not only in the writter
+the Commission not only in the written
 comments cited above, but in public
 testimony before the Commission in
-January 1982. 41/ At the State level,
+January 1982. <u>41</u>/ At the State level,
 a comment from Kenneth Chan notes that
 "the State Historic Preservation Plan
-has not even been adopted into law,
+<u>has not even been adopted into law</u>,
 and has in fact been shelved for the
-past three years. There is no_ comprehensive
+past three years. There is <u>no</u> comprehensive
 plan adopted and utilized by
-the State at this time." 42/
+the State at this time." <u>42</u>/
 Another problem already mentioned
 above is the removal of 579 sites from
@@ Line 73: / Line 46: @@
 plague the State's historic
 preservation program.
 The problems of protecting historic
 sites of importance to native
@@ Line 83: / Line 57: @@
 as sacred by native Hawaiians.
 According to one native Hawaiian:
 The concerns of Hawaiians...are
-different from the concerns of
+: The concerns of Hawaiians...are different from the concerns of archaeologists. We are trained in the Western scientific tradition. We see archaeologic sites primarily as repositories of information. This is in
-archaeologists. We are trained
+{{p|212}}

Template:Nhsc-v1-212 - Revision history

Reid Ginoza at 02:30, 14 April 2006

Jennifer Wada at 10:53, 8 March 2006