Jennifer Wada at 05:21, 24 April 2006

2006-04-24T05:21:27Z

Reid Ginoza at 04:13, 9 March 2006

2006-03-09T04:13:29Z

New page

bAJ Ibid., pp. 119-121.
55/ Ibid., p. 122.
56/ Act of August 6, 1850, \ 1
(1850) Hawaii Laws 202 in 2 Revised
Laws 1925 at 2141. See discussion
above.
57/ See Levy, p. 861; MacKenzie,
p. 11.
58/ An extended discussion is set
forth in Levy, pp. 867-870. Congressman
Daniel Akaka comments that the
analysis presented here of the
problems inherent in settling title to
kuleana lands suggests that the
problems are easily solved. As a
substantive review of this section of
the report and the authorities on
which it relies shows, they are indeed
difficult to solve. One commenter
suggests that the right to exercise
kuleana rights did not terminate in
1855. The comment is simply in error.
See Chinen, The Great Mahele, pp.
30-31, which states that the Land
Commission that granted deeds to such
lands dissolved on March 31, 1855.
59/ See Levy, p. 870, citing a
suggestion of Chief Justice William
Richardson of the Hawaii Supreme
Court.
60/ Such reform might include
permitting adverse possession claims
only if the claimant has entered the
land "in good faith." Such a bill was
passed by the Hawaii legislature in
1973, but vetoed by the governor. See
Levy, p. 870.
61/ The extensive opinion is in
Ranch, Inc. v. Joseph Ahsing, et. al..
Civil No. 1878, Findings of Fact and
Conclusions of Law (Circuit Court of
the Second Circuit, State of Hawaii,
May 12, 1982).
62/ Previous two sentences
suggested in comments received from
Congressman Daniel Akaka.
63/ Addition suggested in comments
received from Congressman Daniel
Akaka.
64/ Many records in the native
Hawaiian language are available but
are not easily accessible as a
resource.
264

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-bAJ Ibid., pp. 119-121.
+<u>54</u>/ <u>Ibid</u>., pp. 119-121.
 / Ibid., p. 122.
-/ Act of August 6, 1850, \ 1
+<u>55</u>/ <u>Ibid</u>., p. 122.
 (1850) Hawaii Laws 202 in 2 Revised
 Laws 1925 at 2141. See discussion
 above.
 / See Levy, p. 861; MacKenzie,
 p. 11.
 / An extended discussion is set
 forth in Levy, pp. 867-870. Congressman
 Daniel Akaka comments that the
 analysis presented here of the
 problems inherent in settling title to
-kuleana lands suggests that the
+<u>kuleana</u> lands suggests that the
 problems are easily solved. As a
 substantive review of this section of
@@ Line 19: / Line 23: @@
 difficult to solve. One commenter
 suggests that the right to exercise
-kuleana rights did not terminate in
+<u>kuleana</u> rights did not terminate in
 . The comment is simply in error.
-See Chinen, The Great Mahele, pp.
+See Chinen, <u>The Great Mahele</u>, pp.
 -31, which states that the Land
 Commission that granted deeds to such
 lands dissolved on March 31, 1855.
 / See Levy, p. 870, citing a
 suggestion of Chief Justice William
 Richardson of the Hawaii Supreme
 Court.
 / Such reform might include
 permitting adverse possession claims
 only if the claimant has entered the
@@ Line 36: / Line 42: @@
 , but vetoed by the governor. See
 Levy, p. 870.
 / The extensive opinion is in
-Ranch, Inc. v. Joseph Ahsing, et. al..
+<u>61</u>/ The extensive opinion is in
 Civil No. 1878, Findings of Fact and
 Conclusions of Law (Circuit Court of
 the Second Circuit, State of Hawaii,
 May 12, 1982).
 / Previous two sentences
 suggested in comments received from
 Congressman Daniel Akaka.
 / Addition suggested in comments
 received from Congressman Daniel
 Akaka.
 / Many records in the native
 Hawaiian language are available but
 are not easily accessible as a
 resource.
+{{p|264}}

Template:Nhsc-v1-264 - Revision history

Jennifer Wada at 05:21, 24 April 2006

Reid Ginoza at 04:13, 9 March 2006