Reid Ginoza at 01:57, 6 May 2006

2006-05-06T01:57:56Z

Reid Ginoza at 17:03, 10 March 2006

2006-03-10T17:03:13Z

New page

209/ c. Julien, America's Eaplre
(New York: Panipheon Books, 1971)» p»
53; 31 Cong. Rec, pp. 5920, 6003
(1898).
210/ H. Wayne Morgan, Wm. McKinley
and His America, (Syracuse, N.Y.:
Syracuse University Press, 1963), p.
295.
211/ Ibid., pp. 295-6.
212/ Ibid., p. 296.
213/ H. R. Rep. No. 1355, 55th
Cong., 2d Sess., p. 29 (1898). The
Office of Hawaiian Affairs commented
that the Commission's Draft Report
M ...reasons that annexation by the
joint resolution method was necessary
because annexation was essential"
(OHA's Comments, p. 17). OHA states
that by the time the annexation
resolution was introduced in Congress
the Spanish-American War was
"virtually over" and asserts that the
joint resolution was utilized "because
of strong opposition in the Senate to
annexation" (OHA's Comments, p. 17).
Similarly, Congressman Daniel Akaka
submits: "It wasn't so much
expediency that required a joint
resolution in Congress as the fact
that many Americans and their
representatives did not support the
annexation of a country whose
government had been established and
maintained with United States military
force" (Congressman Akaka's Comments,
p. 11).
In fact, the Draft Report
acknowledges that there was strong
opposition to the annexation of Hawaii
in the United States Senate (Draft
Report, pp. 203-204; Final Report, pp.
302-303). Furthermore, the comments
ignore the distinction between the
immediate reason for the interest in
annexing Hawaii that prompted the use
of a joint resolution—i.e., fear that
unless the United States acted
immediately some other foreign power
would take over Hawaii--and the
underlying reasons for interest in
annexing Hawaii: the commercial
importance of Hawaii, a fear of
control of Hawaii by the Japanese, and
protection of the Pacific Coast.
These underlying reasons are evident
from the Congressional debate on the
joint resolution.
Theories of present-day historians
that American commercial interests
were the principal motivating force
behind annexation (T. J. Osborne) or
that anti-Japanese sentiment was the
major driving force behind annexation
(W. H. Morgan) (pointed out in Senator
Daniel Inouye's Comments, p. 11) do
not alter the fact that the underlying
reasons for interest in annexation
cited in the Draft Report, in fact,
contributed to sentiment for annexing
the Hawaiian Islands.
214/
(1898).
215/
216/
(1898).
31 Cong. Rec, p. 5772
Julien, p. 53.
31 Cong. Rec, p. 5920
217/ Ibid., p. 6003
218/ Ibid., p. 6141
219/
220/
(1898).
221/
222/
223/
224/
225/
226/
227/
Morgan, p. 296.
31 Cong. Rec, p. 5785
Ibid., p. 5835.
Ibid., p. 6005.
Ibid., p. 5982.
Ibid., p. 6518.
Morgan, p. 297.
Ibid., p. 294.
Ibid., p. 295.
328

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-/ c. Julien, America's Eaplre
+<u>209</u>/ C. Julien, <u>America's Empire</u>
-(New York: Panipheon Books, 1971)» p»
+(New York: Panipheon Books, 1971), p.
 ; 31 Cong. Rec, pp. 5920, 6003
 (1898).
 / H. Wayne Morgan, Wm. McKinley
-and His America, (Syracuse, N.Y.:
+<u>210</u>/ H. Wayne Morgan, <u>Wm. McKinley and His America</u>, (Syracuse, N.Y.:
 Syracuse University Press, 1963), p.
 .
 / Ibid., pp. 295-6.
-/ Ibid., p. 296.
+<u>211</u>/ <u>Ibid</u>., pp. 295-6.
 / H. R. Rep. No. 1355, 55th
 Cong., 2d Sess., p. 29 (1898). The
 Office of Hawaiian Affairs commented
 that the Commission's Draft Report
-M ...reasons that annexation by the
+" ...<u>reasons that annexation by the joint resolution method was necessary because annexation was essential</u>"
 (OHA's Comments, p. 17). OHA states
 that by the time the annexation
@@ Line 35: / Line 36: @@
 force" (Congressman Akaka's Comments,
 p. 11).
 In fact, the Draft Report
 acknowledges that there was strong
@@ Line 56: / Line 58: @@
 from the Congressional debate on the
 joint resolution.
 Theories of present-day historians
 that American commercial interests
@@ Line 65: / Line 68: @@
 Daniel Inouye's Comments, p. 11) do
 not alter the fact that the underlying
-reasons for interest in annexation
+<u>reasons</u> for interest in annexation
 cited in the Draft Report, in fact,
 contributed to sentiment for annexing
 the Hawaiian Islands.
 /
-(1898).
+<u>214</u>/ 31 Cong. Rec., p. 5772
-/
-/
+<u>215</u>/ Julien, p. 53.
-(1898).
-Cong. Rec, p. 5772
+<u>216</u>/ 31 Cong. Rec, p. 5920
 Julien, p. 53.
-Cong. Rec, p. 5920
+<u>217</u>/ <u>Ibid</u>., p. 6003
 / Ibid., p. 6003
-/ Ibid., p. 6141
+<u>218</u>/ <u>Ibid</u>., p. 6141
 /
-/
+<U>219</u>/ Morgan, p. 296.
-(1898).
-/
+<u>220</u>/ 31 Cong. Rec., p. 5785 (1898).
-/
-/
+<u>221</u>/ <u>Ibid</u>., p. 5835
-/
-/
+<u>222</u>/ <u>Ibid</u>., p. 6005
-/
-/
+<U>223</u>/ <u>Ibid</u>., 5982
 Morgan, p. 296.
-Cong. Rec, p. 5785
+<u>224</u>/ <u>Ibid</u>., p. 6518.
-Ibid., p. 5835.
-Ibid., p. 6005.
+/ Morgan, p. 297.
-Ibid., p. 5982.
+/ <u>Ibid</u>., p. 294.
-Ibid., p. 6518.
+/ <u>Ibid</u>., p. 295.
 Morgan, p. 297.
-Ibid., p. 294.
+{{p|328}}

Template:Nhsc-v1-328 - Revision history

Reid Ginoza at 01:57, 6 May 2006

Reid Ginoza at 17:03, 10 March 2006