Difference between revisions of "Template:Nhsc-v1-159"

From GrassrootWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
out the differences between
 
out the differences between
 
constitutions of the Hawaiian Kingdom
 
constitutions of the Hawaiian Kingdom
and of the United States. 62/ Unlike
+
and of the United States. <u>62</u>/ Unlike
 
the system in the United States, the
 
the system in the United States, the
 
Hawaiian monarch was believed to have
 
Hawaiian monarch was believed to have
Line 11: Line 11:
 
original constitution was granted by
 
original constitution was granted by
 
the king and not by "We the people."
 
the king and not by "We the people."
63/ One Hawaiian writer states that:
+
<u>63</u>/ One Hawaiian writer states that:
 
"By proposing the action of the
 
"By proposing the action of the
 
constitution of 1852 the king set a
 
constitution of 1852 the king set a
 
precedent that he could, with the
 
precedent that he could, with the
 
consent of the legislature, change the
 
consent of the legislature, change the
constitution." 64/
+
constitution." <u>64</u>/
Relationships with Foreign
+
 
Governments
+
===<u>Relationships with Foreign Governments</u>===
 +
 
 
These early years of the reign of
 
These early years of the reign of
 
Kamehameha III saw increasing problems
 
Kamehameha III saw increasing problems
with foreigners. The qovernment,
+
with foreigners. The government,
 
particularly its white members,
 
particularly its white members,
struggled tc achieve an aura of
+
struggled to achieve an aura of
 
gravity that would command the respect
 
gravity that would command the respect
 
of the foreigners m the islands.
 
of the foreigners m the islands.
Line 32: Line 33:
 
increasingly questionable. David Malo
 
increasingly questionable. David Malo
 
wrote at this time that "such has
 
wrote at this time that "such has
alwavs been the case with large
+
always been the case with large
 
countries, the small ones have been
 
countries, the small ones have been
 
eaten up." Evil, he wrote, was at the
 
eaten up." Evil, he wrote, was at the
 
door, ready to "come in and bite us."
 
door, ready to "come in and bite us."
65/ The treaties the king had already
+
<u>65</u>/ The treaties the king had already
 
signed with foreign governments were
 
signed with foreign governments were
 
disadvantageous to Hawaii and did
 
disadvantageous to Hawaii and did
 
little to protect the sovereignty of
 
little to protect the sovereignty of
 
the kingdom.
 
the kingdom.
 +
 
Relations with the French were at a
 
Relations with the French were at a
 
particularly low ebb. Besides the
 
particularly low ebb. Besides the
Line 47: Line 49:
 
prohibiting importation and purchase
 
prohibiting importation and purchase
 
of distilled liquors and imposing a
 
of distilled liquors and imposing a
3uty of Sl/gallor, oh imported wines
+
duty of $l/gallon on imported wines
 
was particularly irksome. The problem
 
was particularly irksome. The problem
car.e to head in July 1839. The
+
came to head in July 1839. The
 
commander of a French frigate, Captain
 
commander of a French frigate, Captain
 
Laplace, threatened to use force if
 
Laplace, threatened to use force if
Line 59: Line 61:
 
announced a policy of religious
 
announced a policy of religious
 
toleration.
 
toleration.
 +
 
The convention the king was forced
 
The convention the king was forced
 
to sign contained two clauses that
 
to sign contained two clauses that
 
circumscribed the power of the king:
 
circumscribed the power of the king:
Frenchmen accused of "any
+
 
crime whatever" would be
+
:*Frenchmen accused of "any crime whatever" would be judged by a jury composed of foreigners, proposed by the French consul; and  
judged by a jury composed of
+
 
foreigners, proposed by the
+
:*French merchandise was not to be prohibited nor pay a higher duty than 5 percent ad valorem. <u>66</u>/  
French consul; and
+
 
French merchandise was not to
+
To prevent foreign governments
be prohibited n<~>r pay a
 
higher duty than 5 percent ad
 
valorem. 66/
 
To prevent foreign jovernments
 
 
from taking further advantage of
 
from taking further advantage of
Hawaii, the kinq and his council
+
Hawaii, the king and his council
 
decided that more formal relationships
 
decided that more formal relationships
 
should be established with
 
should be established with
Line 89: Line 88:
 
Timothy Haalilio (a Hawaiian in the
 
Timothy Haalilio (a Hawaiian in the
 
Government).
 
Government).
 +
 
The mission succeeded in the United
 
The mission succeeded in the United
 
States. The first formal recognition
 
States. The first formal recognition

Latest revision as of 18:17, 7 April 2006

In order to understand future constitutional activity of the kingdom, it is important here to point out the differences between constitutions of the Hawaiian Kingdom and of the United States. 62/ Unlike the system in the United States, the Hawaiian monarch was believed to have had the right to promulgate and abrogate constitutions, since the original constitution was granted by the king and not by "We the people." 63/ One Hawaiian writer states that: "By proposing the action of the constitution of 1852 the king set a precedent that he could, with the consent of the legislature, change the constitution." 64/

Relationships with Foreign Governments

These early years of the reign of Kamehameha III saw increasing problems with foreigners. The government, particularly its white members, struggled to achieve an aura of gravity that would command the respect of the foreigners m the islands. Calling upon warships to back up the claims of foreign citizenry continued unabated, however. The ability of the kingdom to survive on its own became increasingly questionable. David Malo wrote at this time that "such has always been the case with large countries, the small ones have been eaten up." Evil, he wrote, was at the door, ready to "come in and bite us." 65/ The treaties the king had already signed with foreign governments were disadvantageous to Hawaii and did little to protect the sovereignty of the kingdom.

Relations with the French were at a particularly low ebb. Besides the religious persecution of Catholics in Hawaii, the passage of an act in 1838 prohibiting importation and purchase of distilled liquors and imposing a duty of $l/gallon on imported wines was particularly irksome. The problem came to head in July 1839. The commander of a French frigate, Captain Laplace, threatened to use force if the king did not accede to several demands made by the French in Hawaii. To avoid bloodshed, the king signed a convention with the French (known as the "Laplace Convention") and announced a policy of religious toleration.

The convention the king was forced to sign contained two clauses that circumscribed the power of the king:

  • Frenchmen accused of "any crime whatever" would be judged by a jury composed of foreigners, proposed by the French consul; and
  • French merchandise was not to be prohibited nor pay a higher duty than 5 percent ad valorem. 66/

To prevent foreign governments from taking further advantage of Hawaii, the king and his council decided that more formal relationships should be established with foreign governments. To accomplish this, a delegation was sent by the Hawaiian Government in 1842 to negotiate for formal recognition and new treaties with the United States, Great Britain, and France, to replace the existing informal and disadvantageous conventions. The delegation was composed of Sir George Simpson (Governor of the Hudson's Bay Company), William Richards, and Timothy Haalilio (a Hawaiian in the Government).

The mission succeeded in the United States. The first formal recognition of Hawaii's independence was in the form of a document given to the Hawaiian envoys by U.S. Secretary of State Daniel Webster on December 30, 1842. The document stated that the United States was more interested in Hawaii than any other nation and that "no power ought either to take

-p159-