Difference between revisions of "Template:Nhsc-v1-211"
From GrassrootWiki
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Officer and the Advisory | + | ::Officer and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation. For State/County projects the reviewing agency is the Department of Land and Natural Resources. |
| − | Council on Historic | + | |
| − | Preservation. For State/County | + | :*Differences in review procedures: There are two major differences. One difference between Federal and State/County review procedures is that Federal projects must consider effects to properties <u>eligible</u> for the National Register, as well as those already listed on the Register. The provision to consider eligibility is very important in that it requires, an identification and evaluation of historic resources in unsurveyed areas. State/County projects must also consider unregistered properties; however, the determination of eligibility procedures are not formulated...The second major difference is the availability at the Federal level of a conflict resolution mechanism if there is disagreement over appropriate mitigative measures. The mechanism is the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation. There is authority already established at the State level to implement a similar advisory council to advise the governor when conflicts arise between State agencies (Sec. 6E-8); however, the provision has not been implemented. <u>39</u>/ |
| − | projects the reviewing agency | + | |
| − | is the Department of Land and | + | ====<u>Acceptance on the National Register</u>==== |
| − | Natural Resources. | + | |
| − | + | Generally, the National Park Service relies on States and Federal agencies to identify historic properties for National Register listing. Because of the experience and ability of the States and Federal agencies in identifying and evaluating historic and cultural properties, the National Park Service will, in most instances, list nominations by States with approved State programs and by Federal agencies without substantive review. This acceptance requires that the Federal agency or State certify that the procedures for making nominations have been properly followed, the documentation is sufficient, and the nomination meets the National Register criteria for evaluation. | |
| − | procedures: There are two | + | |
| − | major differences. One | + | ====<u>Appeals for Nomination</u>===== |
| − | difference between Federal | + | |
| − | and State/County review | + | The Department of the Interior is in the process of establishing procedures for appealing nominations. Under these procedures, any person or local government may appeal to the Keeper of the National Register the failure or refusal of a nominating authority to nominate a property that they consider to meet the National Register criteria for evaluation. |
| − | procedures is that Federal | + | |
| − | projects must consider | + | An applicant seeking to have property nominated to the National Register may appeal directly to the Keeper under the following circumstances: |
| − | effects to properties | + | |
| − | eligible for the National | + | :Where the applicant— |
| − | Register, as well as those | + | ::1) Disagrees with the decision of the State Historic Preservation |
| − | already listed on the | + | {{p|211}} |
| − | Register. The provision to | ||
| − | consider eligibility is very | ||
| − | important in that it requires | ||
| − | , an identification and | ||
| − | evaluation of historic | ||
| − | resources in unsurveyed | ||
| − | areas. State/County projects | ||
| − | must also consider | ||
| − | unregistered properties; | ||
| − | however, the determination of | ||
| − | eligibility procedures are | ||
| − | not formulated...The second | ||
| − | major difference is the | ||
| − | availability at the Federal | ||
| − | level of a conflict | ||
| − | resolution mechanism if there | ||
| − | is disagreement over | ||
| − | appropriate mitigative | ||
| − | measures. The mechanism is | ||
| − | the Advisory Council on | ||
| − | Historic Preservation. There | ||
| − | is authority already | ||
| − | established at the State | ||
| − | level to implement a similar | ||
| − | advisory council to advise | ||
| − | the governor when conflicts | ||
| − | arise between State agencies | ||
| − | (Sec. 6E-8); however, the | ||
| − | provision has not been | ||
| − | implemented. 39/ | ||
| − | Acceptance on the National | ||
| − | |||
| − | Generally, the National Park | ||
| − | Service relies on States and Federal | ||
| − | agencies to identify historic | ||
| − | properties for National Register | ||
| − | listing. Because of the experience | ||
| − | and ability of the States and Federal | ||
| − | agencies in identifying and evaluating | ||
| − | historic and cultural properties, the | ||
| − | National Park Service will, in most | ||
| − | instances, list nominations by States | ||
| − | with approved State programs and by | ||
| − | Federal agencies without substantive | ||
| − | review. This acceptance requires that | ||
| − | the Federal agency or State certify | ||
| − | that the procedures for making | ||
| − | nominations have been | ||
| − | followed, the documentation is | ||
| − | sufficient, and the nomination meets | ||
| − | the National Register criteria for | ||
| − | evaluation. | ||
| − | Appeals for Nomination | ||
| − | The Department of the Interior is | ||
| − | in the process of establishing | ||
| − | procedures for appealing nominations. | ||
| − | Under these procedures, any person | ||
| − | or local government may appeal to the | ||
| − | Keeper of the National Register the | ||
| − | failure or refusal of a nominating | ||
| − | authority to nominate a property that | ||
| − | they consider to meet the National | ||
| − | Register criteria for evaluation. | ||
| − | An applicant seeking to have | ||
| − | property nominated to the National | ||
| − | Register may appeal directly to the | ||
| − | Keeper under the following | ||
| − | circumstances: | ||
| − | Where the applicant— | ||
| − | 1) Disagrees with the | ||
| − | decision of the State | ||
| − | Historic Preservation | ||
| − | 211 | ||
Latest revision as of 00:21, 12 April 2006
- Officer and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation. For State/County projects the reviewing agency is the Department of Land and Natural Resources.
- Differences in review procedures: There are two major differences. One difference between Federal and State/County review procedures is that Federal projects must consider effects to properties eligible for the National Register, as well as those already listed on the Register. The provision to consider eligibility is very important in that it requires, an identification and evaluation of historic resources in unsurveyed areas. State/County projects must also consider unregistered properties; however, the determination of eligibility procedures are not formulated...The second major difference is the availability at the Federal level of a conflict resolution mechanism if there is disagreement over appropriate mitigative measures. The mechanism is the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation. There is authority already established at the State level to implement a similar advisory council to advise the governor when conflicts arise between State agencies (Sec. 6E-8); however, the provision has not been implemented. 39/
Acceptance on the National Register
Generally, the National Park Service relies on States and Federal agencies to identify historic properties for National Register listing. Because of the experience and ability of the States and Federal agencies in identifying and evaluating historic and cultural properties, the National Park Service will, in most instances, list nominations by States with approved State programs and by Federal agencies without substantive review. This acceptance requires that the Federal agency or State certify that the procedures for making nominations have been properly followed, the documentation is sufficient, and the nomination meets the National Register criteria for evaluation.
Appeals for Nomination=
The Department of the Interior is in the process of establishing procedures for appealing nominations. Under these procedures, any person or local government may appeal to the Keeper of the National Register the failure or refusal of a nominating authority to nominate a property that they consider to meet the National Register criteria for evaluation.
An applicant seeking to have property nominated to the National Register may appeal directly to the Keeper under the following circumstances:
- Where the applicant—
- 1) Disagrees with the decision of the State Historic Preservation
|
