Difference between revisions of "Template:Nhsc-v1-233"

From GrassrootWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
addition, if they were not found
 
addition, if they were not found
 
within the allowed time, the number of
 
within the allowed time, the number of
moe-pu'u required also increased. The
+
<u>moe-pu'u</u> required also increased. The
 
first "freeing" of these "death" laws
 
first "freeing" of these "death" laws
 
was a request by Kamehameha I that the
 
was a request by Kamehameha I that the
aoe-pu'u custom not be observed when
+
<u>aoe-pu'u</u> custom not be observed when
 
he died.
 
he died.
 +
 
In 1819, moreover, breaking of the
 
In 1819, moreover, breaking of the
'ai kapu by Keopuolani and Ka'ahumanu
+
<u>'ai kapu</u> by Keopuolani and Ka'ahumanu
 
did not eliminate human sacrifice
 
did not eliminate human sacrifice
 
requirements entirely, for there were
 
requirements entirely, for there were
other kapu akua of capital punishment
+
other <u>kapu akua</u> of capital punishment
 
equally enforceable. What they
 
equally enforceable. What they
 
especially achieved was freedom for
 
especially achieved was freedom for
Line 17: Line 18:
 
prohibited places. The Russian
 
prohibited places. The Russian
 
visitor Lisianski, writing aboard the
 
visitor Lisianski, writing aboard the
Neva (1804-1806), mentioned that he
+
<u>Neva</u> (1804-1806), mentioned that he
 
observed that men could visit the
 
observed that men could visit the
women while they ate in the hale 'aina
+
women while they ate in the <u>hale 'aina</u>
 
but did not partake of the food they
 
but did not partake of the food they
 
ate, while women never went near the
 
ate, while women never went near the
men's hale mua where they were not
+
men's <u>hale mua</u> where they were not
 
allowed. He also observed that men
 
allowed. He also observed that men
and women ate together outside the
+
and women ate together <u>outside</u> the
 
houses while they fished and farmed as
 
houses while they fished and farmed as
 
husbands and wives, but never ate taro
 
husbands and wives, but never ate taro
 
or poi from the same dish. He also
 
or poi from the same dish. He also
 
observed that the house in which the
 
observed that the house in which the
women ate, or the hale 'aina by day,
+
women ate, or the <u>hale 'aina</u> by day,
was the sleeping house at night (hale
+
was the sleeping house at night (<u>hale
moe). 2/ It is known that the houses
+
moe</u>). <u>2</u>/ It is known that the houses
 
of sleeping were places where men and
 
of sleeping were places where men and
 
women came together to be with their
 
women came together to be with their
families, that is to say, the hale moe
+
families, that is to say, the <u>hale moe</u>
was noa, "free," from tabu.
+
was <u>noa</u>, "free," from tabu.
The sanctity of the hale mua was
+
 
due to its being the shrine (unu) of
+
The sanctity of the <u>hale mua</u> was
the god Lono in the Ipu o Lono image.
+
due to its being the shrine (<u>unu</u>) of
The hale mua was called a "shrine of
+
the god <u>Lono</u> in the <u>Ipu o Lono</u> image.
Lono" (uno o Lono) due to the presence
+
The <u>hale mua</u> was called a "shrine of
of the "gourd" (Ipu) in the men's
+
Lono" (<u>uno o Lono</u>) due to the presence
eating house. The 'alana sacrifice,
+
of the "gourd" (<u>Ipu</u>) in the men's
 +
eating house. The <u>'alana</u> sacrifice,
 
by which the men ate of offerings
 
by which the men ate of offerings
placed for the god in the Ipu of
+
placed for the god in the <u>Ipu</u> of
Lono, suspended in a net (koko), was
+
<u>Lono</u>, suspended in a net (<u>koko</u>), was
 
ritually made here before eating of
 
ritually made here before eating of
 
food. The presence of women may be
 
food. The presence of women may be
 
considered as providing a conduit for
 
considered as providing a conduit for
negative transference of mana from the
+
negative transference of <u>mana</u> from the
 
male gods away from male participants.
 
male gods away from male participants.
 
The same kind of inhibition is
 
The same kind of inhibition is
 
recognized in the situating of the
 
recognized in the situating of the
women's menstrual house (hale pe'a)
+
women's menstrual house (<u>hale pe'a</u>)
 
away from the community of "normal"
 
away from the community of "normal"
 
women and men. Men were not allowed
 
women and men. Men were not allowed
in or near the hale pe'a, and were
+
in or near the <u>hale pe'a</u>, and were
 
prohibited from cohabitation with
 
prohibited from cohabitation with
 
menstruating women, as such acts
 
menstruating women, as such acts
reduced availability of mana.
+
reduced availability of <u>mana</u>.
 +
 
 
This duality of separation in the
 
This duality of separation in the
social sphere of kapu akua is rooted
+
social sphere of <u>kapu akua</u> is rooted
 
in the male/female dualism of the
 
in the male/female dualism of the
 
religion that metaphysically assigned
 
religion that metaphysically assigned
Line 69: Line 72:
 
dualism was a tenet of ancient
 
dualism was a tenet of ancient
 
religion defining the male sphere of
 
religion defining the male sphere of
action as distinct from the female. V
+
action as distinct from the female. <u>3</u>/
The overthrow of the kapu system by
+
 
 +
The overthrow of the <u>kapu</u> system by
 
native Hawaiian society was the most
 
native Hawaiian society was the most
 
significant departure, then, effecting
 
significant departure, then, effecting
Line 76: Line 80:
 
politics after contact with Europeans
 
politics after contact with Europeans
 
between 1778 and 1819. (Note that
 
between 1778 and 1819. (Note that
this is still within the preconversion
+
this is still within the pre-conversion
 
period.) It was a significant
 
period.) It was a significant
 
alteration in attitude as
 
alteration in attitude as
belief or faith in the efficacy of
+
<u>belief</u> or <u>faith</u> in the efficacy of
mana of the great male akua gods to
+
<u>mana</u> of the great male <u>akua</u> gods to
 
influence positive outcome in human
 
influence positive outcome in human
 
spheres of power and action from a
 
spheres of power and action from a
supportive spiritual source•
+
supportive spiritual source.
 +
 
 
So-called "deviant" behavior in the
 
So-called "deviant" behavior in the
 
pre-contact period by commoners, while
 
pre-contact period by commoners, while
the kapu system was in force,
+
the <u>kapu</u> system was in force,
 
constituted capital offenses against
 
constituted capital offenses against
both the akua and the community, so
+
both the <u>akua</u> and the community, so
 
that chiefs and priests enforced the
 
that chiefs and priests enforced the
 
penalty as required by a system
 
penalty as required by a system
 
established in traditional custom
 
established in traditional custom
through belief of the entire society
+
through <u>belief of the entire society</u>
in the akua gods. Pre-contact deviant
+
in the <u>akua</u> gods. Pre-contact deviant
behavior by the 'aia" (ungodly) against
+
behavior by the <u>'aia</u> (ungodly) against
the kapu system is documented: "But
+
the <u>kapu</u> system is documented: "But
 
there were people who had no god, and
 
there were people who had no god, and
 
who worshipped nothing; these atheists
 
who worshipped nothing; these atheists
were called 'aia." 4/
+
were called <u>'aia</u>." <u>4</u>/
These "atheists" ('aia) in the precontact
+
 
 +
These "atheists" (<u>'aia</u>) in the pre-contact
 
society are defined as
 
society are defined as
233
+
{{p|233}}

Latest revision as of 15:42, 15 April 2006

addition, if they were not found within the allowed time, the number of moe-pu'u required also increased. The first "freeing" of these "death" laws was a request by Kamehameha I that the aoe-pu'u custom not be observed when he died.

In 1819, moreover, breaking of the 'ai kapu by Keopuolani and Ka'ahumanu did not eliminate human sacrifice requirements entirely, for there were other kapu akua of capital punishment equally enforceable. What they especially achieved was freedom for women to eat with the men and to eat what the men could eat in formerly prohibited places. The Russian visitor Lisianski, writing aboard the Neva (1804-1806), mentioned that he observed that men could visit the women while they ate in the hale 'aina but did not partake of the food they ate, while women never went near the men's hale mua where they were not allowed. He also observed that men and women ate together outside the houses while they fished and farmed as husbands and wives, but never ate taro or poi from the same dish. He also observed that the house in which the women ate, or the hale 'aina by day, was the sleeping house at night (hale moe). 2/ It is known that the houses of sleeping were places where men and women came together to be with their families, that is to say, the hale moe was noa, "free," from tabu.

The sanctity of the hale mua was due to its being the shrine (unu) of the god Lono in the Ipu o Lono image. The hale mua was called a "shrine of Lono" (uno o Lono) due to the presence of the "gourd" (Ipu) in the men's eating house. The 'alana sacrifice, by which the men ate of offerings placed for the god in the Ipu of Lono, suspended in a net (koko), was ritually made here before eating of food. The presence of women may be considered as providing a conduit for negative transference of mana from the male gods away from male participants. The same kind of inhibition is recognized in the situating of the women's menstrual house (hale pe'a) away from the community of "normal" women and men. Men were not allowed in or near the hale pe'a, and were prohibited from cohabitation with menstruating women, as such acts reduced availability of mana.

This duality of separation in the social sphere of kapu akua is rooted in the male/female dualism of the religion that metaphysically assigned to portions of the universe either male or female identity, as in Chinese yin/yang opposition. Male/female dualism was a tenet of ancient religion defining the male sphere of action as distinct from the female. 3/

The overthrow of the kapu system by native Hawaiian society was the most significant departure, then, effecting culture change in religion and politics after contact with Europeans between 1778 and 1819. (Note that this is still within the pre-conversion period.) It was a significant alteration in attitude as belief or faith in the efficacy of mana of the great male akua gods to influence positive outcome in human spheres of power and action from a supportive spiritual source.

So-called "deviant" behavior in the pre-contact period by commoners, while the kapu system was in force, constituted capital offenses against both the akua and the community, so that chiefs and priests enforced the penalty as required by a system established in traditional custom through belief of the entire society in the akua gods. Pre-contact deviant behavior by the 'aia (ungodly) against the kapu system is documented: "But there were people who had no god, and who worshipped nothing; these atheists were called 'aia." 4/

These "atheists" ('aia) in the pre-contact society are defined as

-p233-