Difference between revisions of "Template:Nhsc-v1-225"

From GrassrootWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Native Hawaiian Religion
+
=Native Hawaiian Religion=
A. APPROACH
+
 
 +
==A. APPROACH==
 +
 
 
In order to faithfully represent
 
In order to faithfully represent
 
most modern-day native Hawaiians and
 
most modern-day native Hawaiians and
Line 12: Line 14:
 
citizens of the world. It will concentrate
 
citizens of the world. It will concentrate
 
on several main issues:
 
on several main issues:
1) The ancient Hawaiian concept
+
:1) The ancient Hawaiian concept of the soul of man in relation to ancestral or controlling spiritual beings in nature, or beyond nature, during human life and in a spiritual afterlife.
of the soul of man in relation
+
:2) The relationship between the community worship of the chiefs and priests as a ruling class, and family (<u>'ohana</u>) worship in ancient pre-contact (1778-1779) and post-conversion (1820-) times, continuing into fragmented private family religious observances today in association with introduced forms of worship, reflecting positive or negative identity changes.
to ancestral or controlling
+
:4) The need felt by some emerging native Hawaiian groups to recover self-esteem as Hawaiians by pledging faith in ancient religious beliefs and customs beneficial to group identity through participation in a live, revitalized religious setting, requiring recovery of temple and other shrine sites designated as sacred, with the privilege or right to reenact pertinent rituals in ceremonies conducive to harmonious and inspired religious expression.  
spiritual beings in nature, or
+
:5) Summary of needs and concerns about Hawaiian religion with recommendations for improving religious expression as desired in the present multiethnic social setting.
beyond nature, during human
+
 
life and in a spiritual
+
<u>{{*}}</u>/ The following chapter is a complete
afterlife.
 
2) The relationship between the
 
community worship of the
 
chiefs and priests as a ruling
 
class, and family ('ohana)
 
worship in ancient pre-contact
 
(1778-1779) and post-conversion
 
(1820-) times, continuing into
 
fragmented private family
 
religious observances today in
 
association with introduced
 
forms of worship, reflecting
 
positive or negative identity
 
changes.
 
3) Post-conversion Hawaiian
 
conflict in native identity or
 
crisis in self and group
 
esteem, and its opposite,
 
complete conversion without
 
trauma to other world
 
religions or philosophies;
 
Hawaiian resiliency in
 
adjusted personality and
 
identity change.
 
4) The need felt by some emerging
 
native Hawaiian groups to
 
recover self-esteem as
 
Hawaiians by pledging faith in
 
ancient religious beliefs and
 
customs beneficial to group
 
identity through participation
 
in a live, revitalized
 
religious setting, requiring
 
recovery of temple and other
 
shrine sites designated as
 
sacred, with the privilege or
 
right to reenact pertinent
 
rituals in ceremonies
 
conducive to harmonious and
 
inspired religious
 
expression.
 
5) Summary of needs and concerns
 
about Hawaiian religion with
 
recommendations for improving
 
religious expression as
 
desired in the present multiethnic
 
social setting.
 
JV The following chapter is a complete
 
 
reproduction of the paper
 
reproduction of the paper
 
prepared by Rubellite K. Johnson,
 
prepared by Rubellite K. Johnson,
Line 89: Line 43:
 
text. Except for these changes, Professor
 
text. Except for these changes, Professor
 
Johnson's paper appears as sub-ed.
 
Johnson's paper appears as sub-ed.
mitted by OHA and is otherwise unchang
+
mitted by OHA and is otherwise unchanged.
 
References used by Professor Johnson
 
References used by Professor Johnson
 
appear in the "List of References" of
 
appear in the "List of References" of
 
this Report, marked by a "[3]."
 
this Report, marked by a "[3]."
225
+
{{p|225}}

Latest revision as of 02:07, 15 April 2006

Native Hawaiian Religion

A. APPROACH

In order to faithfully represent most modern-day native Hawaiians and their needs and concerns in this important area of native culture, this report will clarify with as much brevity as possible the aspirations of the Hawaiian people to effect respect for their dignity as native Hawaiians, Hawaiian Americans, and as thoughtful citizens of the world. It will concentrate on several main issues:

1) The ancient Hawaiian concept of the soul of man in relation to ancestral or controlling spiritual beings in nature, or beyond nature, during human life and in a spiritual afterlife.
2) The relationship between the community worship of the chiefs and priests as a ruling class, and family ('ohana) worship in ancient pre-contact (1778-1779) and post-conversion (1820-) times, continuing into fragmented private family religious observances today in association with introduced forms of worship, reflecting positive or negative identity changes.
4) The need felt by some emerging native Hawaiian groups to recover self-esteem as Hawaiians by pledging faith in ancient religious beliefs and customs beneficial to group identity through participation in a live, revitalized religious setting, requiring recovery of temple and other shrine sites designated as sacred, with the privilege or right to reenact pertinent rituals in ceremonies conducive to harmonious and inspired religious expression.
5) Summary of needs and concerns about Hawaiian religion with recommendations for improving religious expression as desired in the present multiethnic social setting.

*/ The following chapter is a complete reproduction of the paper prepared by Rubellite K. Johnson, entitled, "Religion Section of Native Hawaiians Study Commission Report" (February 1983), written at the direction of and funded by the Office of Hawaiian Affairs. Rubellite Johnson is an Associate Professor in Hawaiian Language, Department of Indo-Pacific Languages, at the University of Hawaii, Manoa campus. Minor editorial changes have been made to conform to the Final Report's (cont'd) format, and the footnotes have been redesignated, for the convenience of the reader. Also, information appended to Professor Johnson's paper does not appear in the text of this chapter, but can be found in the Appendix of this Report, referenced at the appropriate places in the text. Except for these changes, Professor Johnson's paper appears as sub-ed. mitted by OHA and is otherwise unchanged. References used by Professor Johnson appear in the "List of References" of this Report, marked by a "[3]."

-p225-