Difference between revisions of "Template:Nhsc-v1-273"

From GrassrootWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Thurston's in the period 1926-
 
Thurston's in the period 1926-
1930." 62/ The objective of the
+
1930." <u>62</u>/ The objective of the
 
league,
 
league,
...as stated in section two of its
+
 
constitution, was "constitutional,
+
:...as stated in section two of its constitution, was "constitutional, representative Government, in fact as well as in form, in the Hawaiian Islands, by all necessary means." Within the League there developed a radical wing and a conservative wing. The radicals favored abolition of the monarchy and the setting up of a republic; some of them wished to go further and seek annexation to the United States. The conservatives, on the other hand, favored retention of the monarchy, but wanted a change of ministry and a drastic revision of the constitution of the kingdom; for them a republic was a last resort, in case the king refused to agree to the reforms demanded. <u>63</u>/
representative Government, in fact
+
 
as well as in form, in the
 
Hawaiian Islands, by all necessary
 
means." Within the League there
 
developed a radical wing and a
 
conservative wing. The radicals
 
favored abolition of the monarchy
 
and the setting up of a republic;
 
some of them wished to go further
 
and seek annexation to the United
 
States. The conservatives, on the
 
other hand, favored retention of
 
the monarchy, but wanted a change
 
of ministry and a drastic revision
 
of the constitution of the
 
kingdom; for them a republic was a
 
last resort, in case the king
 
refused to agree to the reforms
 
demanded. 63/
 
 
With respect to the issue of
 
With respect to the issue of
 
annexation, "Volney V. Ashford, not a
 
annexation, "Volney V. Ashford, not a
Line 31: Line 13:
 
an independent republic, with the view
 
an independent republic, with the view
 
to ultimate annexation to the United
 
to ultimate annexation to the United
States.'"64/ But S. B. Dole, in a
+
States.'" <u>64</u>/ But S. B. Dole, in a
 
letter of December 23, 1893, to
 
letter of December 23, 1893, to
 
Minister A. S. Willis, said that the
 
Minister A. S. Willis, said that the
Line 39: Line 21:
 
but when it had the monarchy in its
 
but when it had the monarchy in its
 
power, conservative councils
 
power, conservative councils
prevailed..." 65/
+
prevailed..." <u>65</u>/
 +
 
 
At a later time, W. R. Castle
 
At a later time, W. R. Castle
 
wrote,
 
wrote,
There was a very strong element in
+
 
the league determined to bring
+
:There was a very strong element in the league determined to bring about annexation to the United States, but prior to the mass meeting which finally resulted in a revolution...this annexation element after a long and very bitter discussion, was defeated and the Hawaiians, meaning thereby those of Hawaiian birth, parentage and affiliation, procured a promise on the part of the league that its attempts would be confined to a reformed Hawaiian government, under sufficient guaranties to insure responsible and safe government." <u>66</u>/
about annexation to the United
+
 
States, but prior to the mass
 
meeting which finally resulted in
 
a revolution..this annexation
 
element after a long and very
 
bitter discussion, was defeated
 
and the Hawaiians, meaning thereby
 
those of Hawaiian birth, parentage
 
and affiliation, procured a
 
promise on the part of the league
 
that its attempts would be
 
confined to a reformed Hawaiian
 
government, under sufficient
 
guaranties to insure responsible
 
and safe government." 66/
 
 
More important than these statements,
 
More important than these statements,
however, is that the "strong support
+
however, is that the "<u>strong support
 
given to the 1887 movement by the
 
given to the 1887 movement by the
 
British residents of Hawaii is good
 
British residents of Hawaii is good
 
evidence that the idea of annexation
 
evidence that the idea of annexation
was not a major factor in it." 67/
+
was not a major factor in it</u>." <u>67</u>/
 +
 
 
As noted previously, the opposition
 
As noted previously, the opposition
 
to the policies and actions of
 
to the policies and actions of
Line 80: Line 50:
 
Gibson's "dismis[sal] from each and
 
Gibson's "dismis[sal] from each and
 
every office held by him under the
 
every office held by him under the
Government." 68/
+
Government." <u>68</u>/
 +
 
 
The absence of any direct American
 
The absence of any direct American
 
involvement in the events that led to
 
involvement in the events that led to
Line 90: Line 61:
 
well-guarded secret; it is known
 
well-guarded secret; it is known
 
however, that there were occasional
 
however, that there were occasional
changes in its composition." 69/ It
+
changes in its composition." <u>69</u>/ It
273
+
{{p|273}}

Latest revision as of 23:38, 23 April 2006

Thurston's in the period 1926- 1930." 62/ The objective of the league,

...as stated in section two of its constitution, was "constitutional, representative Government, in fact as well as in form, in the Hawaiian Islands, by all necessary means." Within the League there developed a radical wing and a conservative wing. The radicals favored abolition of the monarchy and the setting up of a republic; some of them wished to go further and seek annexation to the United States. The conservatives, on the other hand, favored retention of the monarchy, but wanted a change of ministry and a drastic revision of the constitution of the kingdom; for them a republic was a last resort, in case the king refused to agree to the reforms demanded. 63/

With respect to the issue of annexation, "Volney V. Ashford, not a very reliable witness, wrote to Commissioner H. H. Blount on March 8, 1893: 'The plan of the movement of 1887...embraced the establishment of an independent republic, with the view to ultimate annexation to the United States.'" 64/ But S. B. Dole, in a letter of December 23, 1893, to Minister A. S. Willis, said that the revolution of 1887 "was not an annexation movement in any sense, but tended toward an independent republic, but when it had the monarchy in its power, conservative councils prevailed..." 65/

At a later time, W. R. Castle wrote,

There was a very strong element in the league determined to bring about annexation to the United States, but prior to the mass meeting which finally resulted in a revolution...this annexation element after a long and very bitter discussion, was defeated and the Hawaiians, meaning thereby those of Hawaiian birth, parentage and affiliation, procured a promise on the part of the league that its attempts would be confined to a reformed Hawaiian government, under sufficient guaranties to insure responsible and safe government." 66/

More important than these statements, however, is that the "strong support given to the 1887 movement by the British residents of Hawaii is good evidence that the idea of annexation was not a major factor in it." 67/

As noted previously, the opposition to the policies and actions of Kalakaua and his cabinet under Gibson motivated the formation of the Hawaiian League. The abhorrence of and opposition to Gibson and his policies is nowhere more evident than when the Hawaiian League's committee drafted and sent a set of resolutions to Kalakaua. The first resolution called for the dismissal of his present cabinet and the second specifically called for Walter M. Gibson's "dismis[sal] from each and every office held by him under the Government." 68/

The absence of any direct American involvement in the events that led to the Constitution of 1887 is fairly well documented. The management arid control of the Hawaiian League was vested in a "Committee of Thirteen," whose exact make-up "was a fairly well-guarded secret; it is known however, that there were occasional changes in its composition." 69/ It

-p273-