Difference between revisions of "Template:Nhsc-v1-278"

From GrassrootWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
 
Line 5: Line 5:
 
return for this drastic housecleaning,
 
return for this drastic housecleaning,
 
[Kalakaua] was allowed to keep his job
 
[Kalakaua] was allowed to keep his job
as king." 94/
+
as king." <u>94</u>/
In defending the actions of the
+
 
reformers in forcing the king's hand,
+
In defending the actions of the reformers in forcing the king's hand, Attorney General C. W. Ashford stated:  
Attorney General C. W. Ashford stated:
+
 
If the New Constitution had been
+
:If the New Constitution had been submitted to the Legislature it would simply mean that at the end of two years the king would say "This does not suit me," and kill it by absolute veto. There was only one way to proceed, and that was to arbitrarily force the King into giving us a better form of government. <u>95</u>/
submitted to the Legislature it
+
 
would simply mean that at the end
+
===<u>Reciprocity Treaty Renewal—1887</u>===
of two years the king would say
+
 
"This does not suit me," and kill
 
it by absolute veto. There was
 
only one way to proceed, and that
 
was to arbitrarily force the King
 
into giving us a better form of
 
. government. 95/
 
Reciprocity Treaty Renewal—1887
 
 
While the reformers had been in the
 
While the reformers had been in the
 
process of revolt, the commander of
 
process of revolt, the commander of
Line 27: Line 20:
 
administration to go to Canada to
 
administration to go to Canada to
 
negotiate a reciprocal trade agreement
 
negotiate a reciprocal trade agreement
with that country." 96/ This occurred
+
with that country." <u>96</u>/ This occurred
 
only days before the reformers took
 
only days before the reformers took
 
over and raised questions as to
 
over and raised questions as to
Line 36: Line 29:
 
government had seriously intended to
 
government had seriously intended to
 
make such a treaty with Canada.
 
make such a treaty with Canada.
 +
 
With regard to the Reciprocity
 
With regard to the Reciprocity
 
Treaty between Hawaii and the United
 
Treaty between Hawaii and the United
 
States on the other hand:
 
States on the other hand:
Between 1883 and 1887, the
+
 
reciprocity treaty had neither
+
:Between 1883 and 1887, the reciprocity treaty had neither been terminated nor renewed by the United States. The Senate had, at first, been in [the] mood to scrap it, but the State Department, worried over Britain's and Germany's high interest in the Pacific, had insisted on keeping the vacuous treaty alive. Suddenly now, after Kalakaua had been ignobly driven to the corner, the United States asked for the renewal of the agreement. This time it formally demanded cession of Pearl Harbor to the United States. This time—insistently prodded by the reform cabinet—the chastened and worried king signed a new and changed state document. <u>97</u>/
been terminated nor renewed by the
+
 
United States. The Senate had, at
 
first, been in [the] mood
 
to scrap it, but the State
 
Department, worried over
 
Britain's and Germany's high
 
interest in the Pacific, had
 
insisted on keeping the vacuou*
 
treaty alive. Suddenly now,
 
after Kalakaua had been ignobly
 
driven to the corner, the United
 
States asked for the renewal of
 
the agreement. This time it
 
formally demanded cession of
 
Pearl Harbor to the United
 
States. This time—insistently
 
prodded by the reform
 
cabinet—the chastened and
 
worried king signed a new and
 
changed state document. 97/
 
 
Prior to approval of this
 
Prior to approval of this
 
agreement, Secretary of State Blaine
 
agreement, Secretary of State Blaine
Line 67: Line 42:
 
would not permit the transfer of
 
would not permit the transfer of
 
Hawaiian territory or sovereignty to
 
Hawaiian territory or sovereignty to
any European power. 98/ This was
+
any European power. <u>98</u>/ This was
 
followed in 1884 by a resolution from
 
followed in 1884 by a resolution from
 
the U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign
 
the U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign
Line 76: Line 51:
 
establishment of a "naval station for
 
establishment of a "naval station for
 
the United States in the vicinity of
 
the United States in the vicinity of
Honolulu." 99/ Despite this attitude
+
Honolulu." <u>99</u>/ Despite this attitude
 
on the part of the Senate, "the
 
on the part of the Senate, "the
 
supplementary convention with Hawaii
 
supplementary convention with Hawaii
 
was not agreed to by the Senate during
 
was not agreed to by the Senate during
 
the continuance of President Arthur's
 
the continuance of President Arthur's
term of office." 100/
+
term of office." <u>100</u>/
 +
 
 
Again on April 14, 1886, the Senate
 
Again on April 14, 1886, the Senate
 
Committee on Foreign Relations made a
 
Committee on Foreign Relations made a
 
favorable report on the supplementary
 
favorable report on the supplementary
treaty of December 6, 1884. 101/ The
+
treaty of December 6, 1884. <u>101</u>/ The
 
Committee also recommended an
 
Committee also recommended an
 
amendment that would give the United
 
amendment that would give the United
Line 91: Line 67:
 
base at Pearl Harbor. Of this recommendation
 
base at Pearl Harbor. Of this recommendation
 
one author says:
 
one author says:
278
+
{{p|278}}

Latest revision as of 01:08, 24 April 2006

requirements to vote and hold office that effectively brought control of the government within the sphere of the planters and merchants and: "In return for this drastic housecleaning, [Kalakaua] was allowed to keep his job as king." 94/

In defending the actions of the reformers in forcing the king's hand, Attorney General C. W. Ashford stated:

If the New Constitution had been submitted to the Legislature it would simply mean that at the end of two years the king would say "This does not suit me," and kill it by absolute veto. There was only one way to proceed, and that was to arbitrarily force the King into giving us a better form of government. 95/

Reciprocity Treaty Renewal—1887

While the reformers had been in the process of revolt, the commander of the armed wing of the revolutionaries (the Honolulu Rifles), Volney Ashford, "had been selected by the Gibson administration to go to Canada to negotiate a reciprocal trade agreement with that country." 96/ This occurred only days before the reformers took over and raised questions as to whether Ashford had pocketed some of his commission pay for protection money for the king. Because of the timing, it is not clear whether the government had seriously intended to make such a treaty with Canada.

With regard to the Reciprocity Treaty between Hawaii and the United States on the other hand:

Between 1883 and 1887, the reciprocity treaty had neither been terminated nor renewed by the United States. The Senate had, at first, been in [the] mood to scrap it, but the State Department, worried over Britain's and Germany's high interest in the Pacific, had insisted on keeping the vacuous treaty alive. Suddenly now, after Kalakaua had been ignobly driven to the corner, the United States asked for the renewal of the agreement. This time it formally demanded cession of Pearl Harbor to the United States. This time—insistently prodded by the reform cabinet—the chastened and worried king signed a new and changed state document. 97/

Prior to approval of this agreement, Secretary of State Blaine had instructed U.S. Minister Comly (in 1881) that the American Government would not permit the transfer of Hawaiian territory or sovereignty to any European power. 98/ This was followed in 1884 by a resolution from the U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations that not only advised the President to extend the reciprocity treaty, but also suggested that Hawaii should be requested to permit the establishment of a "naval station for the United States in the vicinity of Honolulu." 99/ Despite this attitude on the part of the Senate, "the supplementary convention with Hawaii was not agreed to by the Senate during the continuance of President Arthur's term of office." 100/

Again on April 14, 1886, the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations made a favorable report on the supplementary treaty of December 6, 1884. 101/ The Committee also recommended an amendment that would give the United States the right to establish a naval base at Pearl Harbor. Of this recommendation one author says:

-p278-