Difference between revisions of "Template:Nhsc-v1-374"

From GrassrootWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
A. INTRODUCTION
+
====A. INTRODUCTION====
 +
 
 
The Office of Inspector General has
 
The Office of Inspector General has
 
reviewed selected aspects of the
 
reviewed selected aspects of the
Line 15: Line 16:
 
Homes Commission Act, 1920 (Act) and
 
Homes Commission Act, 1920 (Act) and
 
the Hawaii Admission Act of 1959.
 
the Hawaii Admission Act of 1959.
 +
 
The actual role of the Department
 
The actual role of the Department
 
of the Interior in the affairs of the
 
of the Interior in the affairs of the
Line 33: Line 35:
 
Section 204(4) of the Act stated in
 
Section 204(4) of the Act stated in
 
the memorandum that...
 
the memorandum that...
Such approval by the
+
 
Secretary is considered by the
+
: Such approval by the Secretary is considered by the Department to be a ministerial, nondiscretionary act which he cannot perform until after the Governor has acted. The lack of suitable personnel representing the Department of the Interior in Hawaii to investigate the proposed land exchanges reflects the ministerial nature of the Secretary's function. Thus, Section 204(4), insofar as it requires the Secretary's approval in cases involving land exchanges, represents something of an anachronism which has carried over from the days of territorial status when Hawaii was under the jurisdiction of the Department of the Interior.
Department to be a ministerial,
+
 
nondiscretionary act which he
 
cannot perform until after the
 
Governor has acted. The lack
 
of suitable personnel
 
representing the Department of
 
the Interior in Hawaii to
 
* 37
 
investigate the proposed land
 
exchanges reflects the
 
ministerial nature of the
 
Secretary's function. Thus,
 
Section 204(4), insofar as it
 
requires the Secretary's
 
approval in cases involving land
 
exchanges, represents something
 
of an anachronism which has
 
carried over from the days of
 
territorial status when Hawaii
 
was under the jurisdiction of
 
the Department of the Interior.
 
 
Thus, the Secretary's role since
 
Thus, the Secretary's role since
 
statehood appears to have been of a
 
statehood appears to have been of a
Line 65: Line 47:
 
take action to enforce the provisions
 
take action to enforce the provisions
 
of the Act.
 
of the Act.
 +
 
Our review conducted in Hawaii from
 
Our review conducted in Hawaii from
 
March 9, 1982 through May 13, 1982,
 
March 9, 1982 through May 13, 1982,
Line 88: Line 71:
 
financial statements had not been
 
financial statements had not been
 
prepared for all funds since 1972.
 
prepared for all funds since 1972.
 +
{{p|374}}

Latest revision as of 09:35, 4 June 2006

A. INTRODUCTION

The Office of Inspector General has reviewed selected aspects of the Hawaiian Homes Commission programs operated by the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands (DHHL), State of Hawaii. The review was requested by the Under Secretary, Department of the Interior, in February 1982 to determine if the Department of the Interior has adequately executed its trust responsibilities for programs and activities of the Hawaiian Homes Commission as provided by the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act, 1920 (Act) and the Hawaii Admission Act of 1959.

The actual role of the Department of the Interior in the affairs of the Hawaiian Homes Commission after Hawaii achieved statehood in 1959 has been very limited. The Assistant Secretary of the Interior, in a 1972 memorandum to the Director, DHHL, considered the Department of Interior's role as a "ministerial" function. Specifically, this "ministerial" role related to approval of the exchange of title to available lands for publicly or privately-owned lands of an equal value, as allowed under the Act. The Assistant Secretary commenting on the Secretary's approval role under Section 204(4) of the Act stated in the memorandum that...

Such approval by the Secretary is considered by the Department to be a ministerial, nondiscretionary act which he cannot perform until after the Governor has acted. The lack of suitable personnel representing the Department of the Interior in Hawaii to investigate the proposed land exchanges reflects the ministerial nature of the Secretary's function. Thus, Section 204(4), insofar as it requires the Secretary's approval in cases involving land exchanges, represents something of an anachronism which has carried over from the days of territorial status when Hawaii was under the jurisdiction of the Department of the Interior.

Thus, the Secretary's role since statehood appears to have been of a ministerial nature until March 17, 1980, when attorneys representing native Hawaiian individuals petitioned the Secretary of the Interior and the United States Department of Justice to take action to enforce the provisions of the Act.

Our review conducted in Hawaii from March 9, 1982 through May 13, 1982, was primarily directed to determining how well the intent and provisions of the Act have been carried out, whether all of the land provided by the Act has been properly accounted for, whether the procedures followed in leasing lands were being conducted in the best interests of the program, and whether financial accountability over the financial affairs of the DHHL is adequate. Due to time constraints, complexity of the programs, lack of financial statements, and the number of years the Act has been in existence, we did not review certain aspects of DHHL activities in the depth we originally anticipated. For example, we limited our financial audit effort because complete financial statements had not been prepared for all funds since 1972.

-p374-