Difference between revisions of "Template:Nhsc-v1-322"

From GrassrootWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
85/ Ibid. See also footnote 89,
+
<u>85</u>/ <u>Ibid</u>. See also footnote 89,
 
below.
 
below.
92/ Joesting, p. 220.
+
 
86/ Kuykendall, Volume III, p.
+
<u>86</u>/ Kuykendall, <u>Volume III</u>, p.
363; J. Adler and G. Barrett, The
+
363; J. Adler and G. Barrett, <u>The Diaries of Walter Murray Gibson</u> (Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii,
Diaries of Walter Murray Gibson (Honolulu:
 
University Press of Hawaii,
 
 
1973), p. 162.
 
1973), p. 162.
87/ Kuykendall, Volume III, p.
+
 
364.
+
<u>87</u>/ Kuykendall, <u>Volume III</u>, p. 364.
§8/ Merrill to Bayard, No. 135,
+
 
 +
<u>88</u>/ <u>Merrill to Bayard</u>, No. 135,
 
July 30, 1887, U.S. Department of
 
July 30, 1887, U.S. Department of
 
State Archives, Dispatches, Hawaii
 
State Archives, Dispatches, Hawaii
 
(also in National Archives, Microcopy
 
(also in National Archives, Microcopy
 
T-30, Roll 23).
 
T-30, Roll 23).
89/ Sanford B. Dole explained
+
 
 +
<u>89</u>/ Sanford B. Dole explained
 
concerning the committee bringing the
 
concerning the committee bringing the
 
resolutions to Kalakaua on June 30th
 
resolutions to Kalakaua on June 30th
 
that:
 
that:
The committee Immediately called
+
: The committee immediately called on the King, presented him with a certified copy, and informed him that he was given twenty-four hours in which to make reply. He gave oral reply that it was not necessary to wait; that he would accede now to all the demands. The committee said to the King that the meeting had given him twenty-four hours, and the committee would not change the requirement. Moreover, the committee stated, they wished a reply in writing (Dole, <u>Memoirs of the Hawaiian Revolution</u>, p. 55).
on the King, presented him with a
+
 
certified copy, and informed him
+
<u>90</u>/ <u>Merrill to Bayard</u>, No. 139,
that he was given twenty-four hours
 
in which to make reply. He gave
 
oral reply that it was not
 
necessary to wait; that he would
 
accede now to all the demands. The
 
committee said to the King that the
 
meeting had given him twenty-four
 
hours, and the committee would not
 
change the requirement. Moreover,
 
the committee stated, they wished a
 
reply in writing (Dole, Memoirs of
 
the Hawaiian Revolution, p. 55).
 
90/ Merrill to Bayard, No. 139,
 
 
August 29, 1887, U.S. Department of
 
August 29, 1887, U.S. Department of
 
State Archives, Dispatches, Hawaii
 
State Archives, Dispatches, Hawaii
 
(also in National Archives, Microcopy
 
(also in National Archives, Microcopy
 
T-30, Roll 23).
 
T-30, Roll 23).
91/ Mellen, p. 196.
+
 
93/ Thomas M. Spaulding, Cabinet
+
<u>91</u>/ Mellen, p. 196.
Government in Hawaii, (Honolulu:
+
 
 +
<u>92</u>/ Joesting, p. 220.
 +
 
 +
<u>93</u>/ Thomas M. Spaulding, <U>Cabinet Government in Hawaii</u>, (Honolulu:
 
University of Hawaii Occasional
 
University of Hawaii Occasional
 
Papers, No. 2, 1924), pp. 1 and 8.
 
Papers, No. 2, 1924), pp. 1 and 8.
 
Emphasis added.
 
Emphasis added.
94/ Bailey, p. 297.
+
 
95/ New York Herald, August 25,
+
<u>94</u>/ Bailey, p. 297.
1887, quoted in Daily Bulletin,
+
 
 +
<u>95</u>/ <u>New York Herald</u>, August 25,
 +
1887, quoted in <u>Daily Bulletin</u>,
 
September 7, 1887; cited by
 
September 7, 1887; cited by
Kuykendall, Volume III, p. 371.
+
Kuykendall, <u>Volume III</u>, p. 371.
96/ Joesting, p. 220.
+
 
97/ Bailey, p. 299.
+
<U>96</u>/ Joesting, p. 220.
98/ Hawaiian Instructions, Vol. 2,
+
 
 +
<u>97</u>/ Bailey, p. 299.
 +
 
 +
<u>98</u>/ <u>Hawaiian Instructions</u>, Vol. 2,
 
MS, Dept. of State (November 19,
 
MS, Dept. of State (November 19,
 
1881).
 
1881).
99/ Senate Executive Journal, Vol.
+
 
24, pp. 280 and 289.
+
<u>99</u>/ Senate Executive Journal, Vol. 2, pp. 280 and 289.
100/ Tansill, p. 372.
+
 
101/ Senate Executive Journal,
+
<u>100</u>/ Tansill, p. 372.
 +
 
 +
<u>101</u>/ <u>Senate Executive Journal</u>,
 
Vol. 25, p. 419.
 
Vol. 25, p. 419.
102/ Tansill, pp. 377-78.
+
 
103/ Ibid., p. 379.
+
<u>102</u>/ Tansill, pp. 377-78.
104/ Senator Daniel Inouye states
+
 
 +
<u>103</u>/ <u>Ibid</u>., p. 379.
 +
 
 +
<u>104</u>/ Senator Daniel Inouye states
 
that the Draft Report did not inquire
 
that the Draft Report did not inquire
 
into the "possible role" with regard
 
into the "possible role" with regard
Line 71: Line 71:
 
7 pages were added in response to that
 
7 pages were added in response to that
 
comment.
 
comment.
322
+
{{p|322}}

Latest revision as of 13:58, 30 April 2006

85/ Ibid. See also footnote 89, below.

86/ Kuykendall, Volume III, p. 363; J. Adler and G. Barrett, The Diaries of Walter Murray Gibson (Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii, 1973), p. 162.

87/ Kuykendall, Volume III, p. 364.

88/ Merrill to Bayard, No. 135, July 30, 1887, U.S. Department of State Archives, Dispatches, Hawaii (also in National Archives, Microcopy T-30, Roll 23).

89/ Sanford B. Dole explained concerning the committee bringing the resolutions to Kalakaua on June 30th that:

The committee immediately called on the King, presented him with a certified copy, and informed him that he was given twenty-four hours in which to make reply. He gave oral reply that it was not necessary to wait; that he would accede now to all the demands. The committee said to the King that the meeting had given him twenty-four hours, and the committee would not change the requirement. Moreover, the committee stated, they wished a reply in writing (Dole, Memoirs of the Hawaiian Revolution, p. 55).

90/ Merrill to Bayard, No. 139, August 29, 1887, U.S. Department of State Archives, Dispatches, Hawaii (also in National Archives, Microcopy T-30, Roll 23).

91/ Mellen, p. 196.

92/ Joesting, p. 220.

93/ Thomas M. Spaulding, Cabinet Government in Hawaii, (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Occasional Papers, No. 2, 1924), pp. 1 and 8. Emphasis added.

94/ Bailey, p. 297.

95/ New York Herald, August 25, 1887, quoted in Daily Bulletin, September 7, 1887; cited by Kuykendall, Volume III, p. 371.

96/ Joesting, p. 220.

97/ Bailey, p. 299.

98/ Hawaiian Instructions, Vol. 2, MS, Dept. of State (November 19, 1881).

99/ Senate Executive Journal, Vol. 2, pp. 280 and 289.

100/ Tansill, p. 372.

101/ Senate Executive Journal, Vol. 25, p. 419.

102/ Tansill, pp. 377-78.

103/ Ibid., p. 379.

104/ Senator Daniel Inouye states that the Draft Report did not inquire into the "possible role" with regard to "thwarting subsequent efforts by native Hawaiians to overturn... [the 1887] Constitution in 1889 and to revise it in 1890" (Senator Inouye's Comments, pp. 14-15). The following 7 pages were added in response to that comment.

-p322-