Difference between revisions of "Template:Nhsc-v1-91"

From GrassrootWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
DEMOGRAPHICS
+
==DEMOGRAPHICS==
NOTES
+
 
1/ State of Hawaii, Office of the
+
===NOTES===
 +
 
 +
<u>1</u>/ State of Hawaii, Office of the
 
Governor, "Fact Sheet," April, 1981.
 
Governor, "Fact Sheet," April, 1981.
2/ As noted in the text, the
+
 
 +
<u>2</u>/ As noted in the text, the
 
Native Hawaiians Study Commission
 
Native Hawaiians Study Commission
 
utilized data from a variety of
 
utilized data from a variety of
 
sources. It was hoped, when the Commission
 
sources. It was hoped, when the Commission
begem its work, that all 1980
+
began its work, that all 1980
 
Census data would be available to it
 
Census data would be available to it
 
before the statutory submission deadline
 
before the statutory submission deadline
for its Final Report. in fact,
+
for its Final Report. In fact,
some U.S. 1980 Census date was made
+
some U.S. 1980 Census data was made
 
available by the Bureau of the Census
 
available by the Bureau of the Census
 
via a special tabulation completed for
 
via a special tabulation completed for
Line 28: Line 31:
 
appear in this Final Report are the
 
appear in this Final Report are the
 
most recent availabie--whether from
 
most recent availabie--whether from
State or Federal soarces. A
+
State or Federal sources. A
 
comparison of the historical trends in
 
comparison of the historical trends in
 
the text and the most recent data
 
the text and the most recent data
Line 46: Line 49:
 
statistical data for native Hawaiians
 
statistical data for native Hawaiians
 
are presented are as follows:
 
are presented are as follows:
 +
 
Population 1980
 
Population 1980
 
Age/sex statistics 1980
 
Age/sex statistics 1980
Education 19 77
+
Education 1977
 
--Educational workforce 1980
 
--Educational workforce 1980
--U. of Hawaii enrollment...1982
+
--U. of Hawaii enrollment 1982
Employment status 1 '75
+
Employment status 1975
Occupation status 19"'5
+
Occupation status 1975
 
Income 1977
 
Income 1977
 
Poverty level 1975
 
Poverty level 1975
Welfare 1962
+
Welfare 1982
 
Criminal justice 1981
 
Criminal justice 1981
 
Health
 
Health
infant mortality rates .... 1980
+
--infant mortality rates 1980
--characteristics of births.1980
+
--characteristics of births 1980
life expectancy 1970
+
--life expectancy 1970
—leading causes of death...1980
+
--leading causes of death 1980
incidence of cancer .... 1973-80
+
--incidence of cancer 1973-80
—acute conditions 1980
+
--acute conditions 1980
 
--chronic conditions 1980
 
--chronic conditions 1980
—substance abuse 1979
+
--substance abuse 1979
Interracial marriages....1980-81
+
Interracial marriages 1980-81
Housinu charaetejrist ICS 1^80
+
Housing characterists 1980
i/ Robert C. Schinitt, Demographic
+
 
Statistics of Hawaii 1778-1965
+
<u>3</u>/ Robert C. Schinitt, Demographic
 +
<u>Statistics of Hawaii 1778-1965</u>
 
(Honolulu: University of Hawaii
 
(Honolulu: University of Hawaii
 
Press, 1968). Robert C. Schmitt
 
Press, 1968). Robert C. Schmitt
Line 83: Line 88:
 
Another comment received by the
 
Another comment received by the
 
Commission disputes the relevance of
 
Commission disputes the relevance of
the statistical section of the st.udy.
+
the statistical section of the study.
Congressman Cecil Heftel std.ces:
+
Congressman Cecil Heftel states:
 +
 
 
Similarly the statistical compilations
 
Similarly the statistical compilations
 
of the draft may have some
 
of the draft may have some
Line 91: Line 97:
 
today in juxtaposition with their
 
today in juxtaposition with their
 
contemporaries may locate them, on
 
contemporaries may locate them, on
 +
 
{{p|91}}
 
{{p|91}}

Revision as of 10:09, 24 March 2006

DEMOGRAPHICS

NOTES

1/ State of Hawaii, Office of the Governor, "Fact Sheet," April, 1981.

2/ As noted in the text, the Native Hawaiians Study Commission utilized data from a variety of sources. It was hoped, when the Commission began its work, that all 1980 Census data would be available to it before the statutory submission deadline for its Final Report. In fact, some U.S. 1980 Census data was made available by the Bureau of the Census via a special tabulation completed for the Commission (see "Housing" chapter). However, due to technical problems with the 1980 Census, the publication date for the more detailed information (by State and by ethnic group) was not available to the Commission before the printing deadline for the Commission's Final Report. However, in anticipation of this problem and as a result of comments received by the Commission on its Draft Report, the data that do appear in this Final Report are the most recent availabie--whether from State or Federal sources. A comparison of the historical trends in the text and the most recent data (most only 3 to 5 years old) available suggest that these trends could be expected to continue, even if 1980 Census data were available. As a summary, the following list presents the subject areas for which statistical data appear in this Final Report, and the latest year for which information was available to the Commission. With one exception, none of the data is dated before 1975, and two-thirds of the statistics are dated at least 1980. The areas where statistical data for native Hawaiians are presented are as follows:

Population 1980 Age/sex statistics 1980 Education 1977 --Educational workforce 1980 --U. of Hawaii enrollment 1982 Employment status 1975 Occupation status 1975 Income 1977 Poverty level 1975 Welfare 1982 Criminal justice 1981 Health --infant mortality rates 1980 --characteristics of births 1980 --life expectancy 1970 --leading causes of death 1980 --incidence of cancer 1973-80 --acute conditions 1980 --chronic conditions 1980 --substance abuse 1979 Interracial marriages 1980-81 Housing characterists 1980

3/ Robert C. Schinitt, Demographic Statistics of Hawaii 1778-1965 (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1968). Robert C. Schmitt reviewed the Commission's Draft Report, made several comments on corrections (all of which were incorporated) and noted that: "Notwithstanding these errors, the demographic, statistical, and historical aspects of the study have been handled reasonably well, reflecting a satisfactory degree of competence and objectivity" (p. 3). Another comment received by the Commission disputes the relevance of the statistical section of the study. Congressman Cecil Heftel states:

Similarly the statistical compilations of the draft may have some uses but do not describe or define Hawaiians. To judge Hawaiians today in juxtaposition with their contemporaries may locate them, on

-p91-