Difference between revisions of "Template:Nhsc-v1-329"
Reid Ginoza (talk | contribs) |
Reid Ginoza (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | 228/ As sources for this section, | + | <u>228</u>/ As sources for this section, |
see the Treaties and Acts relating to | see the Treaties and Acts relating to | ||
Territories Annexed; Treaties Proposed | Territories Annexed; Treaties Proposed | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
19-22 (1898), and 1898 Hawaiian | 19-22 (1898), and 1898 Hawaiian | ||
Annexation Papers. | Annexation Papers. | ||
| − | 229/ 31 Cong. Rec, p. 5875 | + | |
| + | <u>229</u>/ 31 Cong. Rec, p. 5875 | ||
(1898). | (1898). | ||
| − | 230/ Ibid. This power has been | + | |
| − | affirmed in American Insurance Company | + | <u>230</u>/ <u>Ibid</u>. This power has been |
| − | v. Canter, 26 U.S. 511, 524 (1828); | + | affirmed in <u>American Insurance Company</u> v. <u>Canter</u>, 26 U.S. 511, 524 (1828); |
Mormon Church v. United States, 136 | Mormon Church v. United States, 136 | ||
U.S. 1, 42-43 (1890); and other cases. | U.S. 1, 42-43 (1890); and other cases. | ||
See also S. Rep. No. 681, 55th Cong., | See also S. Rep. No. 681, 55th Cong., | ||
2d Sess., p. 46 (1898). | 2d Sess., p. 46 (1898). | ||
| − | 231/ See E. Oberholtzer, A History | + | |
| − | of the United States Since the Civil | + | <u>231</u>/ See E. Oberholtzer, <u>A History of the United States Since the Civil War, Volume II</u>, (New York: The |
| − | War, Volume II, (New York: The | ||
Macmillan Co., 1928), pp. 226-227. | Macmillan Co., 1928), pp. 226-227. | ||
| − | 232/ Cong. Globe, 41st Cong., 3d | + | |
| + | <u>232</u>/ Cong. Globe, 41st Cong., 3d | ||
Sess., p. 271 (1870). | Sess., p. 271 (1870). | ||
| − | 233/ Ibid., p. 416. (See also S. | + | |
| + | <u>233</u>/ <u>Ibid</u>., p. 416. (See also S. | ||
Ex. Doc. No. 17 and H. Ex. Doc. Nos. | Ex. Doc. No. 17 and H. Ex. Doc. Nos. | ||
42, 43, 41st Cong., 3d Sess. (1870).) | 42, 43, 41st Cong., 3d Sess. (1870).) | ||
| − | 234/ Oberholtzer, p. 244. | + | |
| − | 235/ 34 Stat. 119. | + | <u>234</u>/ Oberholtzer, p. 244. |
| − | 236/ 31 Cong. Rec, p. 5878 | + | |
| + | <u>235</u>/ 34 Stat. 119. | ||
| + | |||
| + | <u>236</u>/ 31 Cong. Rec, p. 5878 | ||
(1898). (List of island names and | (1898). (List of island names and | ||
locations.) | locations.) | ||
| − | 237/ Ibid. | + | |
| + | <u>237</u>/ <u>Ibid</u>., S. Ex. Doc. No. 79, | ||
40th Cong., 2d Sess., pp. 1-3 | 40th Cong., 2d Sess., pp. 1-3 | ||
(1868). | (1868). | ||
| − | 238/ Presidential Proclamation of | + | |
| + | <u>238</u>/ Presidential Proclamation of | ||
October 27, 1810, 11 Stat. 761. | October 27, 1810, 11 Stat. 761. | ||
| − | 239/ S. Rep. No. 681, 55th Cong., | + | |
| + | <u>239</u>/ S. Rep. No. 681, 55th Cong., | ||
2d Sess., p. 1 (1898). | 2d Sess., p. 1 (1898). | ||
| − | 240/ Ibid., p. 2. | + | |
| − | 241/ Ibid. | + | <u>240</u>/ <u>Ibid</u>., p. 2. |
| − | 242/ 31 Cong. Rec, pp. 6012-6014, | + | |
| + | <u>241</u>/ <u>Ibid</u>. | ||
| + | |||
| + | <u>242</u>/ 31 Cong. Rec, pp. 6012-6014, | ||
6518 (1898); H. R. Rep. No. 1355, 55th | 6518 (1898); H. R. Rep. No. 1355, 55th | ||
Cong., 2d Seas., pp. 53-58 (1898). | Cong., 2d Seas., pp. 53-58 (1898). | ||
| − | 243/ 31 Cong. Rec, p. 6518 | + | |
| − | (1898) | + | <u>243</u>/ 31 Cong. Rec, p. 6518 |
| + | (1898). Further, opponents of | ||
Hawaiian annexation claimed that the | Hawaiian annexation claimed that the | ||
Texas plebiscite set the precedent for | Texas plebiscite set the precedent for | ||
a popular vote on annexation by | a popular vote on annexation by | ||
| − | + | Hawaiians. The forces In favor of | |
Hawaii's annexation, however, argued | Hawaii's annexation, however, argued | ||
that the Act of the Texas legislature | that the Act of the Texas legislature | ||
| Line 56: | Line 68: | ||
resolution, prior to the popular vote, | resolution, prior to the popular vote, | ||
had completed the annexation. | had completed the annexation. | ||
| − | 244/ 31 Cong. Rec, pp. 5845-46 | + | |
| + | <u>244</u>/ 31 Cong. Rec, pp. 5845-46 | ||
(1898). | (1898). | ||
| − | 245/ Morgan, p. 296. | + | |
| − | 246/ Some | + | <u>245</u>/ Morgan, p. 296. |
| + | |||
| + | <u>246</u>/ Some commenters criticized the | ||
Draft Report's comparison of the | Draft Report's comparison of the | ||
annexation of Hawaii and Texas. For | annexation of Hawaii and Texas. For | ||
| Line 71: | Line 86: | ||
differences are accurately reflected | differences are accurately reflected | ||
in the Report. | in the Report. | ||
| − | 247/ S. Doc. No. 214, 55th Cong., | + | |
| + | <u>247</u>/ S. Doc. No. 214, 55th Cong., | ||
2d Sess., pp. 8-9 (1898). | 2d Sess., pp. 8-9 (1898). | ||
| − | 248/ H. R. Rep. No. 1355, 55th | + | |
| + | <u>248</u>/ H. R. Rep. No. 1355, 55th | ||
Cong., 2d Sess., p. 42 (1898); 31 | Cong., 2d Sess., p. 42 (1898); 31 | ||
| − | Cong | + | Cong. Rec, p. 5987 (1898). |
| − | 249/ The total of six native | + | |
| + | <u>249</u>/ The total of six native | ||
Hawalians is taken from a statement of | Hawalians is taken from a statement of | ||
Hawaii'8 Attorney General W. O. | Hawaii'8 Attorney General W. O. | ||
Smith (B. Damon, p. 296). | Smith (B. Damon, p. 296). | ||
| − | 329 | + | {{p|329}} |
Latest revision as of 19:03, 5 May 2006
228/ As sources for this section, see the Treaties and Acts relating to Territories Annexed; Treaties Proposed on Texas and Hawaii. See also S. Rep. No. 681, 55th Cong., 2d Sess., pp. 19-22 (1898), and 1898 Hawaiian Annexation Papers.
229/ 31 Cong. Rec, p. 5875 (1898).
230/ Ibid. This power has been affirmed in American Insurance Company v. Canter, 26 U.S. 511, 524 (1828); Mormon Church v. United States, 136 U.S. 1, 42-43 (1890); and other cases. See also S. Rep. No. 681, 55th Cong., 2d Sess., p. 46 (1898).
231/ See E. Oberholtzer, A History of the United States Since the Civil War, Volume II, (New York: The Macmillan Co., 1928), pp. 226-227.
232/ Cong. Globe, 41st Cong., 3d Sess., p. 271 (1870).
233/ Ibid., p. 416. (See also S. Ex. Doc. No. 17 and H. Ex. Doc. Nos. 42, 43, 41st Cong., 3d Sess. (1870).)
234/ Oberholtzer, p. 244.
235/ 34 Stat. 119.
236/ 31 Cong. Rec, p. 5878 (1898). (List of island names and locations.)
237/ Ibid., S. Ex. Doc. No. 79, 40th Cong., 2d Sess., pp. 1-3 (1868).
238/ Presidential Proclamation of October 27, 1810, 11 Stat. 761.
239/ S. Rep. No. 681, 55th Cong., 2d Sess., p. 1 (1898).
240/ Ibid., p. 2.
241/ Ibid.
242/ 31 Cong. Rec, pp. 6012-6014, 6518 (1898); H. R. Rep. No. 1355, 55th Cong., 2d Seas., pp. 53-58 (1898).
243/ 31 Cong. Rec, p. 6518 (1898). Further, opponents of Hawaiian annexation claimed that the Texas plebiscite set the precedent for a popular vote on annexation by Hawaiians. The forces In favor of Hawaii's annexation, however, argued that the Act of the Texas legislature calling the convention made no provision for a popular vote. It was simply done at the discretion of the Governor. The Texas legislature's acceptance of the terms of the resolution, prior to the popular vote, had completed the annexation.
244/ 31 Cong. Rec, pp. 5845-46 (1898).
245/ Morgan, p. 296.
246/ Some commenters criticized the Draft Report's comparison of the annexation of Hawaii and Texas. For example, comments from Congressman Daniel Akaka state that the comparison is "too pat" and only serves to "mislead and confuse the history of the era." The comparison was in face first made In the 1898 Congressional debates, and the similarities and differences are accurately reflected in the Report.
247/ S. Doc. No. 214, 55th Cong., 2d Sess., pp. 8-9 (1898).
248/ H. R. Rep. No. 1355, 55th Cong., 2d Sess., p. 42 (1898); 31 Cong. Rec, p. 5987 (1898).
249/ The total of six native Hawalians is taken from a statement of Hawaii'8 Attorney General W. O. Smith (B. Damon, p. 296).
|
