Difference between revisions of "Template:Nhsc-v1-348"

From GrassrootWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
the terms of the trust may (but does
 
the terms of the trust may (but does
 
not necessarily) provide a basis for
 
not necessarily) provide a basis for
compensation. 176/ The theory has
+
compensation. <U>176</u>/ The theory has
 
been advanced that, "It has long
 
been advanced that, "It has long
 
been recognized that a special
 
been recognized that a special
Line 7: Line 7:
 
fiduciary relationship, exists
 
fiduciary relationship, exists
 
between the Federal Government and
 
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes," 177/ and that, "The
+
Indian tribes," <u>177</u>/ and that, "The
 
federal-Hawaiian native
 
federal-Hawaiian native
 
relationship arises from United
 
relationship arises from United
Line 14: Line 14:
 
and subsequent federal ownership of
 
and subsequent federal ownership of
 
the legal title to native lands."
 
the legal title to native lands."
178/
+
<u>178</u>/
 +
 
 
A fiduciary relationship between
 
A fiduciary relationship between
 
the Federal Government and an Indian
 
the Federal Government and an Indian
Line 21: Line 22:
 
statute, or agreement whereby the
 
statute, or agreement whereby the
 
Government assumes fiduciary
 
Government assumes fiduciary
obligations toward the tribe. 179/ No
+
obligations toward the tribe. <u>179</u>/ No
 
fiduciary (trust) relationship arose
 
fiduciary (trust) relationship arose
 
from the fact that the United States
 
from the fact that the United States
Line 32: Line 33:
 
States in 1893, and the Federal
 
States in 1893, and the Federal
 
Government exercised no sovereignty
 
Government exercised no sovereignty
over them. 180/ The sovereignty of
+
over them. <U>180</u>/ The sovereignty of
 
the Federal Government over Indian
 
the Federal Government over Indian
 
tribes arises from the fact that these
 
tribes arises from the fact that these
 
tribes reside within the boundaries of
 
tribes reside within the boundaries of
the United States. 181/ In the
+
the United States. <u>181</u>/ In the
 
absence of sovereignty over the
 
absence of sovereignty over the
 
Hawaiian Islands, no fiduciary
 
Hawaiian Islands, no fiduciary
Line 42: Line 43:
 
between the natives of Hawaii and the
 
between the natives of Hawaii and the
 
Federal Government in 1893, or at any
 
Federal Government in 1893, or at any
time prior to annexation. 182/
+
time prior to annexation. <u>182</u>/
 +
 
 
The Joint Resolution of Annexation
 
The Joint Resolution of Annexation
 
(Joint Resolution No. 55 of July 7,
 
(Joint Resolution No. 55 of July 7,
Line 54: Line 56:
 
used solely for the benefit of the
 
used solely for the benefit of the
 
inhabitants of the Hawaiian Islands
 
inhabitants of the Hawaiian Islands
^for educational and other public
+
for educational and other public
 
purposes." This language does not
 
purposes." This language does not
 
give rise to a fiduciary relationship
 
give rise to a fiduciary relationship
Line 61: Line 63:
 
proceeds of the ceded lands were to be
 
proceeds of the ceded lands were to be
 
used solely for the benefit of the
 
used solely for the benefit of the
"native inhabitants of the Hawaiian
+
"<U>native</u> inhabitants of the Hawaiian
Islands." 183/ Whether or not this
+
Islands." <u>183</u>/ Whether or not this
 
language creates a trust relationship
 
language creates a trust relationship
 
between the United States and all
 
between the United States and all
Line 70: Line 72:
 
Commission, which is to examine the
 
Commission, which is to examine the
 
interests of native Hawaiians.
 
interests of native Hawaiians.
 +
 
Similarly, the Organic Act of 1900
 
Similarly, the Organic Act of 1900
 
(31 Stat. 141) did not give rise to a
 
(31 Stat. 141) did not give rise to a
Line 86: Line 89:
 
inhabitants," it would have so
 
inhabitants," it would have so
 
provided.
 
provided.
 +
 
More importantly, Section 91 of the
 
More importantly, Section 91 of the
 
Organic Act indicates lack of any
 
Organic Act indicates lack of any
Line 93: Line 97:
 
the lands ceded by the joint
 
the lands ceded by the joint
 
resolution of annexation were to:
 
resolution of annexation were to:
...remain in the possession,
+
 
use and control of the
+
: ...remain in the possession, use and control of the government of the Territory of Hawaii, and shall be maintained, managed and cared for by it, at its own expense...
government of the Territory of
+
 
Hawaii, and shall be
 
maintained, managed and cared
 
for by it, at its own
 
expense...
 
 
Since Congress in Section 91 of the
 
Since Congress in Section 91 of the
 
Organic Act specifically provided that
 
Organic Act specifically provided that
 
the Territory of Hawaii and not the
 
the Territory of Hawaii and not the
 
Federal Government would control and
 
Federal Government would control and
348
+
{{P|348}}

Latest revision as of 19:21, 6 May 2006

the terms of the trust may (but does not necessarily) provide a basis for compensation. 176/ The theory has been advanced that, "It has long been recognized that a special relationship, characterized as a fiduciary relationship, exists between the Federal Government and Indian tribes," 177/ and that, "The federal-Hawaiian native relationship arises from United States' participation in the overthrow of the native government and subsequent federal ownership of the legal title to native lands." 178/

A fiduciary relationship between the Federal Government and an Indian tribe can, as a general rule, arise only from provisions of a treaty, statute, or agreement whereby the Government assumes fiduciary obligations toward the tribe. 179/ No fiduciary (trust) relationship arose from the fact that the United States Minister in Hawaii supported establishment of the Provisional Government in 1893. (Regarding this history, see preceding chapter.) The salient fact is that the Hawaiian Islands were not part of the United States in 1893, and the Federal Government exercised no sovereignty over them. 180/ The sovereignty of the Federal Government over Indian tribes arises from the fact that these tribes reside within the boundaries of the United States. 181/ In the absence of sovereignty over the Hawaiian Islands, no fiduciary relationship could have existed between the natives of Hawaii and the Federal Government in 1893, or at any time prior to annexation. 182/

The Joint Resolution of Annexation (Joint Resolution No. 55 of July 7, 1898, 30 Stat. 750) also did not give rise to a fiduciary relationship between the United States and the native Hawaiians. The Joint Resolution provided that the revenues or proceeds from the ceded land shall (with specified exceptions) "...be used solely for the benefit of the inhabitants of the Hawaiian Islands for educational and other public purposes." This language does not give rise to a fiduciary relationship with the native Hawaiians because it did not specify that the revenues and proceeds of the ceded lands were to be used solely for the benefit of the "native inhabitants of the Hawaiian Islands." 183/ Whether or not this language creates a trust relationship between the United States and all Hawaiians ("inhabitants") to superintend the use of these funds is a matter beyond the scope of this Commission, which is to examine the interests of native Hawaiians.

Similarly, the Organic Act of 1900 (31 Stat. 141) did not give rise to a trust relationship with the native Hawaiians. Section 73 of the Organic Act provided, in part, that iunds derived from the "sale or lease or other disposal" of the ceded lands shall be "applied to such uses and purposes for the benefit of the inhabitants of the Territory of Hawaii as are consistent with the joint resolution of annexation..." Again, if Congress had intended Section 73 to apply specifically to "native inhabitants," it would have so provided.

More importantly, Section 91 of the Organic Act indicates lack of any intent by Congress to establish a fiduciary relationship with the native Hawaiians. Section 91 provides that the lands ceded by the joint resolution of annexation were to:

...remain in the possession, use and control of the government of the Territory of Hawaii, and shall be maintained, managed and cared for by it, at its own expense...

Since Congress in Section 91 of the Organic Act specifically provided that the Territory of Hawaii and not the Federal Government would control and

-p348-