Difference between revisions of "Template:Nhsc-v1-365"
Reid Ginoza (talk | contribs) |
Reid Ginoza (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | lands (<u>Sioux Tribe, et al</u>. v. <u>United States</u>, 205 Ct.Cl. 148, 171 (1974)). | |
| − | States, 205 Ct.Cl. 148, 171 (1974)). | + | |
| − | 131/ The legislative history is | + | <u>131</u>/ The legislative history is |
full of references to the native | full of references to the native | ||
| − | + | Hawaiian—"<u>native population</u>" (Sen. | |
Doc. No. 214, 55th Cong., 2nd Sess. p. | Doc. No. 214, 55th Cong., 2nd Sess. p. | ||
| − | 8 (1898)); "native Hawaiians" (H.R. | + | 8 (1898)); "<u>native Hawaiians</u>" (H.R. |
Rep. No. 1355, 55th Cong., 2nd Sess., | Rep. No. 1355, 55th Cong., 2nd Sess., | ||
| − | pp. 43, 49, 56 (1898)); "native race," | + | pp. 43, 49, 56 (1898)); "<u>native race</u>," |
| − | "aborigines," "natives" (31 Cong. | + | "<u>aborigines</u>," "<u>natives</u>" (31 Cong. |
Rec, pp. 5982, 6010, 6142, 6144, | Rec, pp. 5982, 6010, 6142, 6144, | ||
6260, 6526, 6663, 6702 (1898)). | 6260, 6526, 6663, 6702 (1898)). | ||
[Emphasis supplied.) | [Emphasis supplied.) | ||
| − | 132/ See H.R. Rep. No. 1355, 55th | + | |
| + | <u>132</u>/ See H.R. Rep. No. 1355, 55th | ||
Cong., 2nd Sess. p. 49 (1898) (two | Cong., 2nd Sess. p. 49 (1898) (two | ||
paragraph discussion and definition of | paragraph discussion and definition of | ||
| Line 23: | Line 24: | ||
"inhabitants of the Hawaiian Islands" | "inhabitants of the Hawaiian Islands" | ||
and the "native Hawaiians"). | and the "native Hawaiians"). | ||
| − | + | ||
| + | <u>133</u>/ 31 Cong. Rec, pp. 6189, | ||
6260-6261, 6526 (1898). | 6260-6261, 6526 (1898). | ||
| − | + | ||
| + | <u>134</u>/ Act of April 30, 1900, 31 | ||
Stat. 141 (1900). | Stat. 141 (1900). | ||
| − | 135/ Section 73, 31 Stat. 141, | + | |
| + | <u>135</u>/ Section 73, 31 Stat. 141, | ||
154. | 154. | ||
| − | 136/ Act of May 17, 1884, 23 Stat. | + | |
| + | <u>136</u>/ Act of May 17, 1884, 23 Stat. | ||
24, 26. | 24, 26. | ||
| − | 137/ Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v. United | + | |
| − | States, 348 U.S. 272, 278 (1955). | + | <u>137</u>/ <u>Tee-Hit-Ton Indians</u> v. <u>United States</u>, 348 U.S. 272, 278 (1955). |
| − | 138/ Ibid. | + | |
| − | 139/ Nor does Section 91 of the | + | <u>138</u>/ <u>Ibid</u>. |
| + | |||
| + | <u>139</u>/ Nor does Section 91 of the | ||
Organic Act of 1900 evidence any | Organic Act of 1900 evidence any | ||
intention by Congress to grant native | intention by Congress to grant native | ||
| Line 40: | Line 47: | ||
Crown and Government lands | Crown and Government lands | ||
permanently. | permanently. | ||
| − | 140/ OHA's Comments, pp. 26-27. | + | |
| + | <u>140</u>/ OHA's Comments, pp. 26-27. | ||
Similarly, Senator Inouye refers to | Similarly, Senator Inouye refers to | ||
the "historical treatment of land | the "historical treatment of land | ||
| Line 48: | Line 56: | ||
States" (Senator Inouye's Comments, p. | States" (Senator Inouye's Comments, p. | ||
39). | 39). | ||
| − | 141/ E.g., Interstate Land Company | + | |
| − | v. Maxwell Land Grant Company, 139 | + | <u>141</u>/ E.g., <u>Interstate Land Company </u>v. <u>Maxwell Land Grant Company</u>, 139 |
U.S. 569, 588 (1891). | U.S. 569, 588 (1891). | ||
| − | 142/ See 45 Am Jur 2nd, | + | |
| − | International Law, $33 (1969). See | + | <u>142</u>/ See 45 Am Jur 2nd, |
| − | also McMicken v. United States, 97 | + | <u>International Law</u>, $33 (1969). See |
| − | U.S. 204, 209 (1877): Hornaby v. | + | also <u>McMicken</u> v. <u>United States</u>, 97 |
| − | United States, 77 U.S. (10 Wall.) 224, | + | U.S. 204, 209 (1877): <u>Hornaby</u> v. |
| − | 234 (1869); and Fremont v. United | + | <u>United States</u>, 77 U.S. (10 Wall.) 224, |
| − | States, 58 U.S. (17 How.) 542, 560 | + | 234 (1869); and <u>Fremont</u> v. <u>United States</u>, 58 U.S. (17 How.) 542, 560 |
(1854). | (1854). | ||
| − | 143/ United States v. Fullard-Leo, | + | |
| − | et. al., 331 U.S. 256, 266 (1947); and | + | <u>143</u>/ <u>United States</u> v. <u>Fullard-Leo, et. al.</u>, 331 U.S. 256, 266 (1947); and |
| − | Hornaby v. United States, 77 U.S. (10 | + | <u>Hornaby</u> v. <u>United States</u>, 77 U.S. (10 |
Wall.) 224, 242 (1969). | Wall.) 224, 242 (1969). | ||
| − | 144/ Thurston v. Bishop, 7 Haw. | + | |
| + | <u>144</u>/ <u>Thurston</u> v. <u>Bishop</u>, 7 Haw. | ||
421, 438 (1888); Kahoomana v. | 421, 438 (1888); Kahoomana v. | ||
Moehonua, 3 Haw. 635, 639 (1875); and | Moehonua, 3 Haw. 635, 639 (1875); and | ||
Kenoa v. Meek, 6 Haw. 63, 67 (1872). | Kenoa v. Meek, 6 Haw. 63, 67 (1872). | ||
| − | 145/ Liliuokalani v. United | + | |
| − | States, 45 Ct.Cl. 418, 426-428 | + | <u>145</u>/ <u>Liliuokalani</u> v. <u>United States</u>, 45 Ct.Cl. 418, 426-428 |
(1910). | (1910). | ||
| − | 146/ Thurston v. Bishop, 7 Haw. | + | |
| + | <u>146</u>/ <u>Thurston</u> v. <u>Bishop</u>, 7 Haw. | ||
421, 438 (1888). | 421, 438 (1888). | ||
| − | 147/ State v. Zimring, 58 Haw. | + | |
| + | <u>147</u>/ <u>State</u> v. <u>Zimring</u>, 58 Haw. | ||
106, 113 (1977). See also Senator | 106, 113 (1977). See also Senator | ||
Inouye's Comments (p. 41, note 20) | Inouye's Comments (p. 41, note 20) | ||
which concur with this statement. | which concur with this statement. | ||
| − | 148/ Barker v. Harvey, 181 U.S. | + | |
| + | <u>148</u>/ <u>Barker</u> v. <u>Harvey</u>, 181 U.S. | ||
481, 498-499 (1901) (property rights | 481, 498-499 (1901) (property rights | ||
| − | under Mexican law); Indians of | + | under Mexican law); <u>Indians of California</u> v. <u>United States</u>, 98 Ct. |
| − | California v. United States, 98 Ct. | + | CI. 583, 591-592 (1942), <u>cert. denied</u>, |
| − | CI. 583, 591-592 (1942), cert | ||
319 U.S. 764 (1943) (property rights | 319 U.S. 764 (1943) (property rights | ||
| − | under Mexican law); and Hayt v. United | + | under Mexican law); and <u>Hayt</u> v. <u>United States</u>, 38 Ct. CI. 455, 461-464 (1903) |
| − | States, 38 Ct. CI. 455, 461-464 (1903) | ||
(property rights under Mexican law). | (property rights under Mexican law). | ||
| − | Cf. Carino v. Insular Government of | + | <u>Cf</u>. <u>Carino</u> v. <u>Insular Government of the Philippine Islands</u>, 212 U.S. 449 |
| − | the Philippine Islands, 212 U.S. 449 | ||
(1909) (land claimed as property of | (1909) (land claimed as property of | ||
| − | 365 | + | {{p|365}} |
Latest revision as of 23:15, 12 May 2006
lands (Sioux Tribe, et al. v. United States, 205 Ct.Cl. 148, 171 (1974)).
131/ The legislative history is full of references to the native Hawaiian—"native population" (Sen. Doc. No. 214, 55th Cong., 2nd Sess. p. 8 (1898)); "native Hawaiians" (H.R. Rep. No. 1355, 55th Cong., 2nd Sess., pp. 43, 49, 56 (1898)); "native race," "aborigines," "natives" (31 Cong. Rec, pp. 5982, 6010, 6142, 6144, 6260, 6526, 6663, 6702 (1898)). [Emphasis supplied.)
132/ See H.R. Rep. No. 1355, 55th Cong., 2nd Sess. p. 49 (1898) (two paragraph discussion and definition of "native Hawaiians"); 31 Cong. Rec, p. 6189 (reference to "the Hawaiians proper," i.e., "full-blooded" and "part" Hawaiians, as one of three "important races"); and 31 Cong. Rec, p. 6573 (distinction drawn between "inhabitants of the Hawaiian Islands" and the "native Hawaiians").
133/ 31 Cong. Rec, pp. 6189, 6260-6261, 6526 (1898).
134/ Act of April 30, 1900, 31 Stat. 141 (1900).
135/ Section 73, 31 Stat. 141, 154.
136/ Act of May 17, 1884, 23 Stat. 24, 26.
137/ Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v. United States, 348 U.S. 272, 278 (1955).
138/ Ibid.
139/ Nor does Section 91 of the Organic Act of 1900 evidence any intention by Congress to grant native Hawaiians the right to use and occupy Crown and Government lands permanently.
140/ OHA's Comments, pp. 26-27. Similarly, Senator Inouye refers to the "historical treatment of land titles conferred by foreign governments to lands subsequently annexed by or ceded to the United States" (Senator Inouye's Comments, p. 39).
141/ E.g., Interstate Land Company v. Maxwell Land Grant Company, 139 U.S. 569, 588 (1891).
142/ See 45 Am Jur 2nd, International Law, $33 (1969). See also McMicken v. United States, 97 U.S. 204, 209 (1877): Hornaby v. United States, 77 U.S. (10 Wall.) 224, 234 (1869); and Fremont v. United States, 58 U.S. (17 How.) 542, 560 (1854).
143/ United States v. Fullard-Leo, et. al., 331 U.S. 256, 266 (1947); and Hornaby v. United States, 77 U.S. (10 Wall.) 224, 242 (1969).
144/ Thurston v. Bishop, 7 Haw. 421, 438 (1888); Kahoomana v. Moehonua, 3 Haw. 635, 639 (1875); and Kenoa v. Meek, 6 Haw. 63, 67 (1872).
145/ Liliuokalani v. United States, 45 Ct.Cl. 418, 426-428 (1910).
146/ Thurston v. Bishop, 7 Haw. 421, 438 (1888).
147/ State v. Zimring, 58 Haw. 106, 113 (1977). See also Senator Inouye's Comments (p. 41, note 20) which concur with this statement.
148/ Barker v. Harvey, 181 U.S. 481, 498-499 (1901) (property rights under Mexican law); Indians of California v. United States, 98 Ct. CI. 583, 591-592 (1942), cert. denied, 319 U.S. 764 (1943) (property rights under Mexican law); and Hayt v. United States, 38 Ct. CI. 455, 461-464 (1903) (property rights under Mexican law). Cf. Carino v. Insular Government of the Philippine Islands, 212 U.S. 449 (1909) (land claimed as property of
|
