Difference between revisions of "Template:Nhsc-v1-383"

From GrassrootWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
totaling 456 acres as Home
+
:totaling 456 acres as Home lands that were not included in the blue book.  
lands that were not included in
+
 
the blue book.
+
:6. There are Home lands which have been withdrawn from use by DHHL under various Governor's Executive Orders. As discussed in detail elsewhere in this report, the Attorney General and the courts have ruled that the Governor's Executive Order powers do not apply to Home lands; therefore, the withdrawals were not legal. The Akinaka Study and the DHHL blue book have excluded some of the acreage covered by Executive Orders. For example, 1,356 acres set aside by Executive Orders 382 on January 21, 1930 and 599 on December 22, 1933, are not included in either the Akinaka Study or the DHHL blue book. These lands in Lualualei, on the island of Oahu, are used by the United States Navy as part of radio transmitting station and an ammunition depot.  
6. There are Home lands which have
+
 
been withdrawn from use by DHHL
+
:7. The Akinaka Study included 40 acres in Kealakehe and 48 acres in Milolii which represented acreage to be obtained in an exchange that was never consummated.  
under various Governor's
+
 
Executive Orders. As discussed
+
:8. The tax maps show three parcels of land totaling approximately 148 acres of State of Hawaii lands. According to a Deputy Attorney General it appears that the parcels should be Home lands. The parcels were returned to the control of the Commissioner of Public Lands of the Territory of Hawaii to be used for the Molokai Airport under Hawaiian Homes Commission Resolution 61, October 12, 383 1938, and Resolution 77, May 13, 1942. The parcels were not included in the DHHL blue book inventory of public lands.  
in detail elsewhere in this
+
 
report, the Attorney General
+
:9. One parcel of Home lands is now under private ownership and no lands were received by the Commission in exchange. The land consisting of 8 acres was withdrawn under Governor's Executive Order 545 for a tree nursery and forest ranger station. Then in 1947, the Territory Board of Public Lands included the land in a larger parcel of land exchanged for private-owned land to be included in the Kohala Forest Reserve. The DHHL land records do not include the exchanged lands in the Home lands inventory.  
and the courts have ruled that
+
 
the Governor's Executive Order
+
:10. The Act's use of the term "more or less" has created problems. For Home lands in an area where the acreage received by DHHL was less than the acreage provided by the Act no adjustment was made. To illustrate, in the area of Kalaupapa on the island of Molokai, DHHL received only 1,247 of the 5,000 acres "more or less" mentioned in the Act because the area contained only this amount of acreage. On the other hand, when the available acreage was more than the acreage mentioned in the Act, such as was the case in the Kawaihae I area on the island of Hawaii, DHHL did not receive the benefit of all of the acreage in excess of the Act amount. For the Kawaihae I area, DHHL was informed by the Attorney General in a July 19, 1966 memorandum that because the area of Kawaihae I
powers do not apply to Home
+
{{p|383}}
lands; therefore, the
 
withdrawals were not legal.
 
The Akinaka Study and the DHHL
 
blue book have excluded some of
 
the acreage covered by
 
Executive Orders. For example,
 
1,356 acres set aside by
 
Executive Orders 382 on January
 
21, 1930 and 599 on December
 
22, 1933, are not included in
 
either the Akinaka Study or the
 
DHHL blue book. These lands in
 
Lualualei, on the island of
 
Oahu, are used by the United
 
States Navy as part of radio
 
transmitting station and an
 
ammunition depot.
 
7. The Akinaka Study included 40
 
acres in Kealakehe and 48 acres
 
in Milolii which represented
 
acreage to be obtained in an
 
exchange that was never
 
consummated.
 
8. The tax maps show three parcels
 
of land totaling approximately
 
148 acres of State of Hawaii
 
lands. According to a Deputy
 
Attorney General it appears
 
that the parcels should be Home
 
lands. The parcels were
 
returned to the control of the
 
Commissioner of Public Lands of
 
the Territory of Hawaii to be
 
used for the Molokai Airport.
 
under Hawaiian Homes Commission
 
Resolution 61, October 12,
 
383
 
1938, and Resolution 77, May
 
13, 1942. The parcels were not
 
included in the DHHL blue book
 
inventory of public lands.
 
9. One parcel of Home lands is now
 
under private ownership and no
 
lands were received by the
 
Commission in exchange. The
 
land consisting of 8 acres was
 
withdrawn under Governor's
 
Executive Order 545 for a tree
 
nursery and forest ranger
 
station. Then in 1947, the
 
Territory Board of Public Lands
 
included the land in a larger
 
parcel of land exchanged for
 
private-owned land to be
 
included in the Kohala Forest
 
Reserve. The DHHL land records
 
do not include the exchanged
 
lands in the Home lands
 
inventory.
 
10. The Act's use of the term "more
 
or less" has created problems.
 
For Home lands in an area where
 
the acreage received by DHHL
 
was less than the acreage
 
provided by the Act no
 
adjustment was made. To
 
illustrate, in the area of
 
Kalaupapa on the island of
 
Molokai, DHHL received only
 
1,247 of the 5,000 acres "more
 
or less" mentioned in the Act
 
because the area contained only
 
this amount of acreage. On the
 
other hand, when the available
 
acreage was more than the
 
acreage mentioned in the Act,
 
such as was the case in the
 
Kawaihae I area on the island
 
of Hawaii, DHHL did not receive
 
the benefit of all of the
 
acreage in excess of the Act
 
amount. For the Kawaihae I
 
area, DHHL was informed by the
 
Attorney General in a July 19,
 
1966 memorandum that because
 
the area of Kawaihae I
 

Latest revision as of 00:20, 28 May 2006

totaling 456 acres as Home lands that were not included in the blue book.
6. There are Home lands which have been withdrawn from use by DHHL under various Governor's Executive Orders. As discussed in detail elsewhere in this report, the Attorney General and the courts have ruled that the Governor's Executive Order powers do not apply to Home lands; therefore, the withdrawals were not legal. The Akinaka Study and the DHHL blue book have excluded some of the acreage covered by Executive Orders. For example, 1,356 acres set aside by Executive Orders 382 on January 21, 1930 and 599 on December 22, 1933, are not included in either the Akinaka Study or the DHHL blue book. These lands in Lualualei, on the island of Oahu, are used by the United States Navy as part of radio transmitting station and an ammunition depot.
7. The Akinaka Study included 40 acres in Kealakehe and 48 acres in Milolii which represented acreage to be obtained in an exchange that was never consummated.
8. The tax maps show three parcels of land totaling approximately 148 acres of State of Hawaii lands. According to a Deputy Attorney General it appears that the parcels should be Home lands. The parcels were returned to the control of the Commissioner of Public Lands of the Territory of Hawaii to be used for the Molokai Airport under Hawaiian Homes Commission Resolution 61, October 12, 383 1938, and Resolution 77, May 13, 1942. The parcels were not included in the DHHL blue book inventory of public lands.
9. One parcel of Home lands is now under private ownership and no lands were received by the Commission in exchange. The land consisting of 8 acres was withdrawn under Governor's Executive Order 545 for a tree nursery and forest ranger station. Then in 1947, the Territory Board of Public Lands included the land in a larger parcel of land exchanged for private-owned land to be included in the Kohala Forest Reserve. The DHHL land records do not include the exchanged lands in the Home lands inventory.
10. The Act's use of the term "more or less" has created problems. For Home lands in an area where the acreage received by DHHL was less than the acreage provided by the Act no adjustment was made. To illustrate, in the area of Kalaupapa on the island of Molokai, DHHL received only 1,247 of the 5,000 acres "more or less" mentioned in the Act because the area contained only this amount of acreage. On the other hand, when the available acreage was more than the acreage mentioned in the Act, such as was the case in the Kawaihae I area on the island of Hawaii, DHHL did not receive the benefit of all of the acreage in excess of the Act amount. For the Kawaihae I area, DHHL was informed by the Attorney General in a July 19, 1966 memorandum that because the area of Kawaihae I
-p383-