Difference between revisions of "Template:Nhsc-v1-434"
Reid Ginoza (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | FEDERAL RESPONSES TO THE NEEDS | + | =FEDERAL RESPONSES TO THE NEEDS OF NATIVE HAWAIIANS= |
| − | OF NATIVE HAWAIIANS | + | ==NOTES== |
| − | NOTES | + | <u>1</u>/ Testimony of Winona Rubin to |
| − | |||
the Native Hawaiians Study Commission, | the Native Hawaiians Study Commission, | ||
January 15, 1982, p. 2. | January 15, 1982, p. 2. | ||
| − | 2/ P.L. 95-568. | + | |
| − | + | <u>2</u>/ P.L. 95-568. | |
| − | 4/ P.L. 95-341. | + | |
| − | 5/ P.L. 96-398. | + | <u>3</u>/ P.L. 95-524 |
| − | + | ||
| − | 6/ 48 U.S.C. § | + | <u>4</u>/ P.L. 95-341. |
| − | + | ||
| − | in Hawaii (MILPRO-HI), State of | + | <u>5</u>/ P.L. 96-398. |
| − | Hawaii, April 1979, by the Department | + | |
| + | <u>6</u>/ 48 U.S.C. § § 691, <u>et seq</u>. | ||
| + | |||
| + | <u>7</u>/ <u>Military Property Requirements in Hawaii (MILPRO-HI), State of Hawaii</u>, April 1979, by the Department | ||
of Defense. The study excludes | of Defense. The study excludes | ||
evaluation of Fort DeRussy and the | evaluation of Fort DeRussy and the | ||
| Line 22: | Line 24: | ||
stated that sale of Fort DeRussy would | stated that sale of Fort DeRussy would | ||
be "an insensitive move." | be "an insensitive move." | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | <u>8</u>/ MILPRO-HI, Executive Summary, p. 3. | |
| − | MILPRO-HI, Executive Summary, | + | |
| − | 9/ MILPRO-HI, Section F. | + | <u>9</u>/ MILPRO-HI, Section F. |
| − | 10/ MILPRO-HI, p. A-l. | + | |
| − | 11/ MILPRO-HI, Section E. | + | <u>10</u>/ MILPRO-HI, p. A-l. |
| − | + | ||
| + | <u>11</u>/ MILPRO-HI, Section E. | ||
| + | |||
| + | <u>12</u>/ It has been suggested that any | ||
surplus federal lands be placed in | surplus federal lands be placed in | ||
| − | + | trust for native Hawaiians. However, | |
present law requires that ceded lands | present law requires that ceded lands | ||
be returned to the State. Statutes | be returned to the State. Statutes | ||
| Line 36: | Line 41: | ||
property govern disposition of the | property govern disposition of the | ||
remaining lands and property. | remaining lands and property. | ||
| − | 13/ An analysis was made in March | + | |
| − | 1982 to | + | <u>13</u>/ An analysis was made in March |
| − | + | 1982 to assist in expediting | |
| + | acquisition through purchase or | ||
exchange. | exchange. | ||
| − | 434 | + | {{p|434}} |
Latest revision as of 17:46, 13 June 2006
FEDERAL RESPONSES TO THE NEEDS OF NATIVE HAWAIIANS
NOTES
1/ Testimony of Winona Rubin to the Native Hawaiians Study Commission, January 15, 1982, p. 2.
2/ P.L. 95-568.
3/ P.L. 95-524
4/ P.L. 95-341.
5/ P.L. 96-398.
6/ 48 U.S.C. § § 691, et seq.
7/ Military Property Requirements in Hawaii (MILPRO-HI), State of Hawaii, April 1979, by the Department of Defense. The study excludes evaluation of Fort DeRussy and the Island of Kahoolawe, in accordance with Secretary of Defense guidelines, but includes that property in total land area evaluations. One commenter stated that sale of Fort DeRussy would be "an insensitive move."
8/ MILPRO-HI, Executive Summary, p. 3.
9/ MILPRO-HI, Section F.
10/ MILPRO-HI, p. A-l.
11/ MILPRO-HI, Section E.
12/ It has been suggested that any surplus federal lands be placed in trust for native Hawaiians. However, present law requires that ceded lands be returned to the State. Statutes regarding federal disposal of surplus property govern disposition of the remaining lands and property.
13/ An analysis was made in March 1982 to assist in expediting acquisition through purchase or exchange.
|
