Difference between revisions of "Template:Nhsc-v1-319"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Vol. I, No. 3, Ralph S. Kuykendall, p. | Vol. I, No. 3, Ralph S. Kuykendall, p. | ||
42 (1926). Note: Entire Dispatch No. | 42 (1926). Note: Entire Dispatch No. | ||
| − | 122 reprinted in Hawaiian Diplomatic | + | 122 reprinted in <u>Hawaiian Diplomatic |
| − | Correspondence.) | + | Correspondence</u>.) |
| − | 27/ Burns, p. 168. | + | |
| − | 28/ Bailey, p. 285. | + | <u>27</u>/ Burns, p. 168. |
| − | 29/ Joesting, p. 213. | + | |
| − | 30/ Damon, p. 160. | + | <u>28</u>/ Bailey, p. 285. |
| − | 31/ Joesting, p. 214. | + | |
| − | 32/ Ibid. | + | <u>29</u>/ Joesting, p. 213. |
| − | 33/ Mellen, p. 102. | + | |
| − | + | <u>30</u>/ Damon, p. 160. | |
| − | 35/ Bailey, p. 286. | + | |
| − | 36/ Mellen, p. 107. | + | <u>31</u>/ Joesting, p. 214. |
| − | + | ||
| − | 37/ See comment received from | + | <u>32</u>/ <u>Ibid</u>. |
| + | |||
| + | <u>33</u>/ Mellen, p. 102. | ||
| + | |||
| + | <u>34</u>/ <u>Ibid</u>., p. 103. | ||
| + | |||
| + | <u>35</u>/ Bailey, p. 286. | ||
| + | |||
| + | <u>36</u>/ Mellen, p. 107. | ||
| + | |||
| + | <u>37</u>/ See comment received from | ||
Robert C. Schmitt, p. 3. | Robert C. Schmitt, p. 3. | ||
| − | 38/ Mellen, p. 115. | + | |
| − | 39/ Ibid., p. 120. | + | <u>38</u>/ Mellen, p. 115. |
| − | 40/ Ibid., p. 121. | + | |
| − | 41/ Bailey, p. <187. | + | <u>39</u>/ <u>Ibid</u>., p. 120. |
| − | 42/ Mellen, p. 122. | + | |
| − | 43/ Damon, p. 166. | + | <u>40</u>/ <u>Ibid</u>., p. 121. |
| − | 44/ Mellen, p. 125. | + | |
| − | 45/ Bailey, p. 288. | + | <u>41</u>/ Bailey, p. <187. |
| − | 46/ Mellen, p. 164. | + | |
| − | 47/ Damon, p. 175. | + | <u>42</u>/ Mellen, p. 122. |
| − | 48/ Mellen, p. 169. | + | |
| − | 50/ Joesting, p. 217. Congressman | + | <u>43</u>/ Damon, p. 166. |
| + | |||
| + | <u>44</u>/ Mellen, p. 125. | ||
| + | |||
| + | <u>45</u>/ Bailey, p. 288. | ||
| + | |||
| + | <u>46</u>/ Mellen, p. 164. | ||
| + | |||
| + | <u>47</u>/ Damon, p. 175. | ||
| + | |||
| + | <u>48</u>/ Mellen, p. 169. | ||
| + | |||
| + | <u>49</u>/ Damon, p. 192. | ||
| + | |||
| + | <u>50</u>/ Joesting, p. 217. Congressman | ||
Daniel Akaka comments that the Draft | Daniel Akaka comments that the Draft | ||
Report on page 184, "indicates that | Report on page 184, "indicates that | ||
the spark that ignited the | the spark that ignited the | ||
annexationists was the signing of a | annexationists was the signing of a | ||
| − | + | bill to regulate the sale of opium and | |
| − | a | + | a bill to establish a lottery" |
(Akaka's Comments, pp. 5-6). In | (Akaka's Comments, pp. 5-6). In | ||
addition, it is asserted that these | addition, it is asserted that these | ||
| − | + | bills "...were merely used as excuses | |
by the annexationists to bring down | by the annexationists to bring down | ||
| − | the Monarchy" (Akaka's Comments, p. | + | the Monarchy" (Akaka's Comments, p.6). Other commenters raised a similar |
| − | 6 ) . Other commenters raised a similar | ||
point. | point. | ||
| + | |||
The draft report does not refer to | The draft report does not refer to | ||
| − | the | + | the lottery bill until page 190, in |
| − | the section on | + | the section on Liliuokalani’s reign. |
Moreover, the comments do not | Moreover, the comments do not | ||
accurately reflect the chronology of | accurately reflect the chronology of | ||
| − | events. The | + | events. The lottery bill was enacted |
in 1893—not in 1886-1887 which is the | in 1893—not in 1886-1887 which is the | ||
period discussed at pages 184-185 of | period discussed at pages 184-185 of | ||
| − | the draft | + | the draft report. More importantly, |
the statement cited in support of | the statement cited in support of | ||
these comments is a December 20, 1893 | these comments is a December 20, 1893 | ||
| Line 57: | Line 81: | ||
the draft report refer to the | the draft report refer to the | ||
"reformers"—not "annexationists." | "reformers"—not "annexationists." | ||
| − | 51/ Damon, p. 192. | + | |
| − | 52/ Joesting, p. 217. | + | <u>51</u>/ Damon, p. 192. |
| − | 53/ Bailey, p. 21. | + | |
| − | + | <u>52</u>/ Joesting, p. 217. | |
| − | 55/ Joesting, p. 218. | + | |
| − | 56/ Bailey, p. 295. | + | <u>53</u>/ Bailey, p. 21. |
| − | 57/ Senator Daniel Inouye and | + | |
| + | <u>54</u>/ <u>Ibid</u>., p. 291. | ||
| + | |||
| + | <u>55</u>/ Joesting, p. 218. | ||
| + | |||
| + | <u>56</u>/ Bailey, p. 295. | ||
| + | |||
| + | <u>57</u>/ Senator Daniel Inouye and | ||
others commented that the Draft Report | others commented that the Draft Report | ||
| − | + | fails to inquire into the possible | |
role of the United States Government | role of the United States Government | ||
in the adoption of the 1887 | in the adoption of the 1887 | ||
| − | Constitution; i . e . , the extent to | + | Constitution; i.e., the extent to |
| − | 319 | + | {{p|319}} |
Latest revision as of 17:15, 29 April 2006
Vol. I, No. 3, Ralph S. Kuykendall, p. 42 (1926). Note: Entire Dispatch No. 122 reprinted in Hawaiian Diplomatic Correspondence.)
27/ Burns, p. 168.
28/ Bailey, p. 285.
29/ Joesting, p. 213.
30/ Damon, p. 160.
31/ Joesting, p. 214.
32/ Ibid.
33/ Mellen, p. 102.
34/ Ibid., p. 103.
35/ Bailey, p. 286.
36/ Mellen, p. 107.
37/ See comment received from Robert C. Schmitt, p. 3.
38/ Mellen, p. 115.
39/ Ibid., p. 120.
40/ Ibid., p. 121.
41/ Bailey, p. <187.
42/ Mellen, p. 122.
43/ Damon, p. 166.
44/ Mellen, p. 125.
45/ Bailey, p. 288.
46/ Mellen, p. 164.
47/ Damon, p. 175.
48/ Mellen, p. 169.
49/ Damon, p. 192.
50/ Joesting, p. 217. Congressman Daniel Akaka comments that the Draft Report on page 184, "indicates that the spark that ignited the annexationists was the signing of a bill to regulate the sale of opium and a bill to establish a lottery" (Akaka's Comments, pp. 5-6). In addition, it is asserted that these bills "...were merely used as excuses by the annexationists to bring down the Monarchy" (Akaka's Comments, p.6). Other commenters raised a similar point.
The draft report does not refer to the lottery bill until page 190, in the section on Liliuokalani’s reign. Moreover, the comments do not accurately reflect the chronology of events. The lottery bill was enacted in 1893—not in 1886-1887 which is the period discussed at pages 184-185 of the draft report. More importantly, the statement cited in support of these comments is a December 20, 1893 statement made with respect to conditions in 1893 and not events in 1886-1887. Finally, pages 184-185 of the draft report refer to the "reformers"—not "annexationists."
51/ Damon, p. 192.
52/ Joesting, p. 217.
53/ Bailey, p. 21.
54/ Ibid., p. 291.
55/ Joesting, p. 218.
56/ Bailey, p. 295.
57/ Senator Daniel Inouye and others commented that the Draft Report fails to inquire into the possible role of the United States Government in the adoption of the 1887 Constitution; i.e., the extent to
|
