Difference between revisions of "Template:Nhsc-v1-92"
Reid Ginoza (talk | contribs) m |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | some socio-economic scale, but | + | : some socio-economic scale, but does not answer the crucial question: How true are their lives to native Hawaiian culture and values? |
| − | does not answer the crucial | + | |
| − | question: How true are their | + | : It is not enough to look back a century and reach certain conclusions, not enouqh to probe the past with modern statistical tools, unless you also are able to evaluate the Hawaiian experience and ethics against a Hawaiian concept. What may appear undesirable in one culture can have a logical explanation in another. To do a total, meaningful summation of Hawaiians, it will be necessary to measure them against Hawaiian values (pp. 1-2). |
| − | + | ||
| − | and values? | + | <u>4</u>/ Schmitt, pp. 18-22 |
| − | It is not enough to look back a | + | |
| − | century and reach certain conclusions, | + | <u>5</u>/ <u>Ibid</u>., p. 16. |
| − | not enouqh to probe the | + | |
| − | past with modern | + | <u>6</u>/ <u>Ibid</u>., p. 68. |
| − | + | ||
| − | evaluate the Hawaiian experience | + | <u>7</u>/ <u>Ibid</u>., p. 114. |
| − | and ethics against a Hawaiian | + | |
| − | concept. What may appear | + | <u>8</u>/ <u>Public Law 96-565</u>, 96th Congress (94 STAT. 3321), Title III, Section 305, December 22, 1980. |
| − | undesirable in one culture can | + | |
| − | have a logical explanation in | + | <u>9</u>/ There was some confusion on definitions used in the Commission's Draft Report since these terms were not always used consistently (see comment by Herbert Jay (Nahaolelua) |
| − | another. To do a | + | Almeida). An attempt has been made to correct that situation. |
| − | summation of Hawaiians, it | + | |
| − | + | <u>10</u>/ Schmitt, p. 37. | |
| − | against Hawaiian values (pp. 1-2). | + | |
| − | 4/ Schmitt, pp. 18-22 | + | <u>11</u>/ Adams, quoted in Schmitt, |
| − | 5/ Ibid., p. 16. | ||
| − | 6/ Ibid., p. 68. | ||
| − | |||
| − | 8/ Public Law 96-565, 96th | ||
| − | Congress (94 STAT. 3321), Title III, | ||
| − | Section 305, December 22, 1980. | ||
| − | 9/ There was some confusion on | ||
| − | definitions used in the Commission's | ||
| − | Draft Report since these terms were | ||
| − | not always used consistently (see | ||
| − | comment by Herbert Jay (Nahaolelua) | ||
| − | Almeida). An attempt has been made to | ||
| − | correct that situation. | ||
| − | 10/ Schmitt, p. 37. | ||
| − | 11/ Adams, quoted in Schmitt, | ||
p. 37. | p. 37. | ||
| − | 12/ Trene B. Taeuber, "Hawaii," | + | |
| − | Population Index 28 (April 1962):98. | + | <u>12</u>/ Trene B. Taeuber, "Hawaii," |
| − | 13/ Schmitt, p. 39. | + | <u>Population</u> Index 28 (April 1962):98. |
| − | 14/ Andrew w. Lind, Hawaii 's | + | |
| − | People, 3rd ed. (Honolulu: | + | <u>13</u>/ Schmitt, p. 39. |
| − | of Hawaii Press, | + | |
| − | 15/ | + | <u>14</u>/ Andrew w. Lind, <u>Hawaii's People</u>, 3rd ed. (Honolulu: University |
| − | 16/ Neil Levy, "Native | + | of Hawaii Press, 1967), p, 7. |
| − | Land Rights," The California | + | |
| − | Review, Volume | + | <u>15</u>/ <u>Ibid</u>., pp. 17-19. |
| − | 17/ Ralph S. Kuykendall, The | + | |
| − | Hawaiian Kingdom, | + | <u>16</u>/ Neil Levy, "Native Hawaiian |
| − | Foundation and Transformation | + | Land Rights," <u>The California Law Review</u>, Volume 63 (July 1975): 849. |
| − | (Honolulu: University of | + | |
| − | Press, 1968), pp. | + | <u>17</u>/ Ralph S. Kuykendall, <u>The Hawaiian Kingdom, Volume 1, 1778-1854, |
| − | cited as "Kuykendall, Volume | + | Foundation and Transformation </u> |
| − | 18/ | + | (Honolulu: University of Hawaii |
| − | Grove Day, Hawaii: A History, | + | Press, 1968), pp. 88-89. [Hereinafter |
| − | Polynesian | + | cited as "Kuykendall, <u>Volume 1</u>."] |
| − | (New York: Prentice- | + | |
| − | Inc. 1948 | + | <u>18</u>/ Ralph S. Kuykendall and A. |
| − | 19/ For example( see Taeuber, p. | + | Grove Day, <u>Hawaii: A History, From |
| − | 98 (cited above | + | Polynesian Kingdom to American Commonwealth |
| − | p. 43; Kuykendall, Volume I, pp. | + | </u>(New York: Prentice-Hall, |
| − | 89-90; Schmitt, p. 36; Adams, p. 7. | + | Inc., 1948), p.42. |
| + | |||
| + | <u>19</u>/ For example( see Taeuber, p. | ||
| + | 98 (cited above); Kuykendall and Day, | ||
| + | p. 43; Kuykendall, <u>Volume I</u>, pp. 89-90; Schmitt, p. 36; Adams, p. 7. | ||
This paragraph was revised as the | This paragraph was revised as the | ||
result of a comment by Congressman | result of a comment by Congressman | ||
| − | Daniel Akaka, who states: "The | + | Daniel Akaka, who states: "The claim |
that 'social disruption' was caused by | that 'social disruption' was caused by | ||
| − | Kamehameha I | + | Kamehameha I becoming the prime aqent |
for the sandalwood trade is made | for the sandalwood trade is made | ||
| − | without substance (p. 19-20) | + | without substance (p. 19-20). Where |
is the evidence for such a claim? | is the evidence for such a claim? | ||
There is no citation to indicate the | There is no citation to indicate the | ||
| Line 74: | Line 63: | ||
conclusion, I find the statement | conclusion, I find the statement | ||
implausible since it suggests that the | implausible since it suggests that the | ||
| − | Hawaiians are | + | Hawaiians are to blame for their own |
demise" (p. 3 ). | demise" (p. 3 ). | ||
| − | 20 | + | |
| − | 21/ | + | <u>20</u>/ Taeuber, 108. |
| + | |||
| + | <u>21</u>/ Romanzo Adams, <u>Interacial | ||
Marriage in Hawaii: A Study of the | Marriage in Hawaii: A Study of the | ||
Mutually Conditioned Processes of | Mutually Conditioned Processes of | ||
| − | Acculturation and Amalgamation, | + | Acculturation and Amalgamation</u>, |
| − | reprinted | + | reprinted from 1937 ed. (New York: |
| − | AMS Press, 1969). pp. | + | AMS Press, 1969). pp. 31-32. |
| + | |||
{{p|92}} | {{p|92}} | ||
Latest revision as of 10:32, 24 March 2006
- some socio-economic scale, but does not answer the crucial question: How true are their lives to native Hawaiian culture and values?
- It is not enough to look back a century and reach certain conclusions, not enouqh to probe the past with modern statistical tools, unless you also are able to evaluate the Hawaiian experience and ethics against a Hawaiian concept. What may appear undesirable in one culture can have a logical explanation in another. To do a total, meaningful summation of Hawaiians, it will be necessary to measure them against Hawaiian values (pp. 1-2).
4/ Schmitt, pp. 18-22
5/ Ibid., p. 16.
6/ Ibid., p. 68.
7/ Ibid., p. 114.
8/ Public Law 96-565, 96th Congress (94 STAT. 3321), Title III, Section 305, December 22, 1980.
9/ There was some confusion on definitions used in the Commission's Draft Report since these terms were not always used consistently (see comment by Herbert Jay (Nahaolelua) Almeida). An attempt has been made to correct that situation.
10/ Schmitt, p. 37.
11/ Adams, quoted in Schmitt, p. 37.
12/ Trene B. Taeuber, "Hawaii," Population Index 28 (April 1962):98.
13/ Schmitt, p. 39.
14/ Andrew w. Lind, Hawaii's People, 3rd ed. (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1967), p, 7.
15/ Ibid., pp. 17-19.
16/ Neil Levy, "Native Hawaiian Land Rights," The California Law Review, Volume 63 (July 1975): 849.
17/ Ralph S. Kuykendall, The Hawaiian Kingdom, Volume 1, 1778-1854, Foundation and Transformation (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1968), pp. 88-89. [Hereinafter cited as "Kuykendall, Volume 1."]
18/ Ralph S. Kuykendall and A. Grove Day, Hawaii: A History, From Polynesian Kingdom to American Commonwealth (New York: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1948), p.42.
19/ For example( see Taeuber, p. 98 (cited above); Kuykendall and Day, p. 43; Kuykendall, Volume I, pp. 89-90; Schmitt, p. 36; Adams, p. 7. This paragraph was revised as the result of a comment by Congressman Daniel Akaka, who states: "The claim that 'social disruption' was caused by Kamehameha I becoming the prime aqent for the sandalwood trade is made without substance (p. 19-20). Where is the evidence for such a claim? There is no citation to indicate the source for this conclusion. Without an identification of both the source and the justification for its conclusion, I find the statement implausible since it suggests that the Hawaiians are to blame for their own demise" (p. 3 ).
20/ Taeuber, 108.
21/ Romanzo Adams, Interacial Marriage in Hawaii: A Study of the Mutually Conditioned Processes of Acculturation and Amalgamation, reprinted from 1937 ed. (New York: AMS Press, 1969). pp. 31-32.
|
